Browse
Search
BOH minutes 102606
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Health
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
BOH minutes 102606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 4:55:36 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 4:55:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/26/2005
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH <br />October 26, 2006 <br />Board of Health Minutes Transcription completed by Anne Miles Cassell 4 <br /> October 26, 2006 <br /> <br />Rosemary Summers reported that the Brunswick County Board of Health and the <br />New Hanover County Board of Health are spearheading an effort to have legislation <br />introduced that would allow local counties to set fees for food and lodging <br />inspections. Currently, each restaurant pays the state an annual fee of $50. The state <br />returns approximately 60-75% of this fee to local health departments, depending on <br />the local department’s compliance rate. Because this fee is “charged” at the state <br />level, there is a prohibition for local health departments to charge a fee. The amount <br />Orange County receives annually from the state for this program ranges from $7,500 <br />to $10,000. Roughly $360,000 each year is spent in personnel and operating costs <br />for this program, with nearly all of the cost being in personnel. This cost estimate <br />does not include capital expenditures such as vehicles and computers. <br /> <br />Included in this resolution is a provision for the state to be “held harmless” in the <br />amount of money they currently receive from this process should the responsibility <br />shift to the local level. The state currently maintains staff to manage the statewide <br />database and provide consultative services in the program to all areas of the state. <br />This would require some form of “rebate” to the state by local health departments <br />from the fees collected by local agencies, or retention of state “Aid to County” funds. <br /> <br />The NC Association of Local Health Directors is asking local Boards of Health to <br />consider passing similar resolutions in support of legislation such as this being <br />introduced. Previous attempts to introduce and pass similar legislation have met <br />with stiff resistance from the restaurant association. <br /> <br />Staff has discussed this proposal and feel that the cost of billing and collection will <br />outweigh the cost of recovery process. Even if only 50% of the cost can be attributed <br />to restaurants, the fee would be approximately $400 - $500 per year for each <br />restaurant. This would not include additional staff needed for billing and collection <br />purposes. Staff feels that an alternative that urges the state to raise the current fees <br />to a more appropriate level and distribute that across the state would be a better <br />alternative for this county. <br /> <br />Alan Rimer expressed the opinion that the fee for service, at an increased inspection <br />fee of $500, is a cost of doing business and would amount to pennies per customer <br />and would not impact the at-large population of the county that does not frequent <br />restaurants. <br /> <br />Rosemary Summers stated that the department feels that fees should be raised but <br />the question remained of whether it should be collected at the state or local level. <br />Moses Carey, Jr. agreed that fees needed to be increased for cost recovery at both <br />state and local levels. Sharon Van Horn asked about when and how the fees are <br />paid. Tom Konsler replied that the state invoices once per year and fees are remitted <br />to the state. Staff is also concerned that legislation if passed would contain <br />limitations on fee amounts, hampering local attempts to recover costs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.