Orange County NC Website
MINUTES <br />ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH <br />April 21, 2010 <br />Board of Health Minutes Transcription completed by Anne Miles Cassell 10 April 21, 2010 <br /> <br />Chris Harlan replied that she recognized that the whole issue is about the level <br />taxes are at in Orange County but it doesn’t recognize the whole picture. She <br />emphasized that paying taxes is a part of being a citizen of this world and we <br />should willingly pay taxes if it makes life better for everybody. There is no point <br />living in a society with a huge number of people who have everything they <br />could ever want and a whole other portion that has very little. That is not quality <br />of life for anybody. And this whole premise of taking a stand that “we’re not <br />going to raise taxes” is in her opinion unethical. To make the cuts the way we <br />have to make them at the level of health and human services is not right. We <br />are no longer living in an ethical society. <br /> <br />Anissa Vines said that last year the Board did put Carr Mill on the table and that it <br />would be helpful for her to hear from staff why that wasn’t put back on the <br />chopping block for this year. <br /> <br />Christopher Cooke asked to briefly respond to some of the comments. He stated <br />that he is not sure what the difference is between accepting a 15% cut and then <br />shaping what we propose to cut or in saying no we don’t accept it, having it cut <br />anyway and shaping what we do with the cut. It seems to be the same thing. <br />This is where public health usually finds itself in these kinds of discussions, which is <br />fighting over the scraps. What he suggested is if there is an opportunity to take <br />this discussion to the next level, maybe we should be doing that. With no <br />pushback how can we expect to have a different conversation next year? <br />There’s no reason to do that because Commissioner Yuhasz is right. The <br />Commissioners know what they have to do. They’re looking at numbers; they <br />are required to do certain things. As important as it is to be cognizant about the <br />pain that is across the community and how we need to be on the team, etc, he <br />stated he has no problem with that. There is also the advocacy side of the coin <br />which is at some point we have to argue with the status quo if we think the status <br />quo is hurting the community from the public health point of view. If we are at <br />the minimum level for services, why aren’t more alternatives on the table? That’s <br />my point. <br /> <br />Anissa Vines said she had concerns about the Social Worker II position that was <br />eliminated after listening to the Child Fatality Task Force report and knowing that <br />last year we had to make some major changes to the family home visiting <br />program. One of the reasons why we had advocated for keeping that position <br />was because it was providing services to at-risk families. The chair also said she <br />had concerns about Environmental Health. Currently the Office Assistant <br />position has been eliminated, but prior to that an Environmental Health Specialist <br />position was frozen creating a further backlog in critical food and lodging <br />inspections. <br /> <br />Steve Yuhasz commented that he has heard people come out and say “raise <br />my taxes so we can put more money into the schools” but he has not heard <br />people come out and say “raise my taxes so we can put more money into <br />public health.” <br />