Browse
Search
OUTBoard agenda 111517
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
OUTBoard agenda 111517
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 4:14:44 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 3:51:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/15/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OUTBoard minutes 111617
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange Unified Transportation Board\Minutes\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
110 David Laudicina commented that Chatham County is planning to develop its whole northeastern quadrant with <br />111 60,000 new residents. <br />112 <br />113 Andy Henry agreed that Chatham County's population is growing the fastest, especially around Pittsboro with a new <br />114 development called Chatham Park, and the existing Briar Chapel community. Chatham County has an agreement <br />115 with Cary about how far they can come into the County with planning. There are a lot of apartments and senior <br />116 housing in that area. <br />117 <br />118 Art Menius commented on the 2013 population just for the portion in Chatham; it is about twice the entire population <br />119 for Chatham in the 1980 Census. <br />120 <br />121 Andy Henry agreed that Chatham County is forecasted to grow pretty quickly. He continued his presentation. The <br />122 performance measures in the alternative analysis shows different data on measures such as the average minutes of <br />123 delay per person and mode share in a "no build" scenario. Travel isochrones show how far someone can travel in the <br />124 afternoon peak within 10 -20 -30 minutes (see contours on the maps in presentation) in centers heavy in commuting <br />125 traffic around the Triangle (especially in downtown Durham, Chapel Hill, Hillsborough, etc.). The idea is to show how <br />126 easy it is to commute. Travel time is also measured on roadway corridors like 1 -85 to look at travel time in a "no build" <br />127 scenario and the effects of building alternatives. Mr. Henry pointed out that even with improvements, travel time will <br />128 not recover. According to the model, if travel time is 20 minutes with the "no build" scenario, it may go down to 16 <br />129 minutes even with costly improvements, but not much lower than that. The congestion map shows volume (V = <br />130 number of vehicles on the road) divided by capacity (C = how many vehicles road can handle). The map is color - <br />131 coded per percentage. The Level of Service at a 100 percent is a level of service "E," on an A -F range where "F" <br />132 (120 %) is traffic almost standing still and "A" is free - flowing. Therefore, a level "E" is pretty congested. The main <br />133 highway corridors are very congested as well as areas within Chapel Hill and around it, especially around Estes <br />134 Drive. <br />135 <br />136 Heidi Perry asked if these maps are based off of single occupancy vehicles for each person, so when you think of <br />137 population growth, even with a "no build" scenario, you are talking about having more single occupancy vehicles. <br />138 <br />139 Andy Henry said that he was glad Ms. Perry brought -up the "no build" scenario. The presentation is based on no <br />140 build, no further improvements with the 2045 population and employment on the model. However, it is not all single <br />141 occupancy vehicles; 10 —15% would not be single occupancy vehicles. <br />142 <br />143 Heidi Perry asked if the current mode share is built -out too. <br />144 <br />145 Andy Henry said that this is a difficult question to answer but the model does not take the current mode share. The <br />146 model has some behavior worked into it; it will change the mode share between single occupancy and multi - <br />147 occupancy. However, it does not change much; the model is not that sensitive. <br />148 <br />149 Alex Castro asked who determines the parameters of the model. <br />150 <br />151 Andy Henry said that there is a team that works on the model. The Triangle Regional Model has four partners: our <br />152 MPO, the Capital Area MPO, NCDOT, and Go Triangle. The partners provide financial investment and there is a <br />153 model team at NC State in the Institute for Transportation Research and Education (ITRE). <br />154 <br />155 Alex Castro asked for clarification as to if there was a standard model used statewide. <br />156 <br />157 Andy Henry replied that there is not a standard model. <br />158 <br />159 Alex Castro asked if the model is just used by the region. <br />160 <br />161 Andy Henry confirmed this. He said that there is a statewide model but it just does the main roads. Regions use the <br />162 statewide model to help inform the goings -on outside of the model area regarding trends and changes. <br />163 <br />164 Heidi Perry asked if Mr. Henry has looked at previous projections to see how they played out. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.