Browse
Search
OUTBoard agenda 111517
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
OUTBoard agenda 111517
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 4:14:44 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 3:51:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/15/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OUTBoard minutes 111617
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange Unified Transportation Board\Minutes\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
56 choose STPP projects. STPP or Strategic Transportation Prioritization Process is a gateway into NCDOT <br />57 methodology for funding projects in the transportation approval program. Funding plans are stretched out over 10 <br />58 years, in these cases. The MTP lists highway transit and bicycle and pedestrian projects to address deficiencies <br />59 through the year 2045. The plan is based on future land use, population, employment and the travel demand model <br />60 (to be discussed later in the presentation), and a financial plan. Projects must be in the MTP to get federal funding to <br />61 then move into the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Planners used to use the MTP to reserve right -of- <br />62 way for future roadways. Mr. Henry reviewed the process of creating the MTP, breaking down various analyses, <br />63 projections, and the creating of key alternatives for addressing congestion. The MPO will release its draft, referred to <br />64 as its "preferred option," in October. This draft will go back out for public input, at which time the OUTBoard can also <br />65 make additional comments. The plan and report will likely be approved by December 2017 or January 2018. Another <br />66 part of the process is running the alternatives analysis in consideration of land use and transportation networks. The <br />67 alternatives are put through the Triangle Regional Model to see how well the alternatives meet future demand. The <br />68 alternatives are not presented singularly; projects will be taken out from the various alternatives for the final plan. Mr. <br />69 Henry went over the process of creating alternatives in more depth. He said that they take two land use scenarios; <br />70 one is the community plan, based on local comprehensive land use plans, and the other is the "aim high" plan where <br />71 higher density scenarios are examined in the urbanized areas, like around proposed light rail stations. These plans <br />72 are combined with a transportation network with lots of highway projects, along with one with fewer highway projects <br />73 and more transit, and then a network that balances highway and transit. These combinations inform the alternatives. <br />74 For land use, guide totals for population and employment are put into the land use model and then the model <br />75 distributes the population - employment around the counties to see where they think it will go. Looking at Orange <br />76 County, the population is currently about 139,000 people. In 2045 it is estimated to be 194,000, a 40 percent <br />77 increase. Employment -wise, there are currently about 64,000 jobs in Orange County. In 2045, there will be about <br />78 107,000 jobs, a 68 percent increase. Employment is increasing faster than population in Orange County, a pattern in <br />79 all the other counties in the MPO as well. <br />80 <br />81 Erle Smith asked how Mr. Henry figured a 28 percent disparity between population growth and employment growth. <br />82 This suggests a pretty high unemployment rate. <br />83 <br />84 Andy Henry answered that this figure is based on the growth rate. The County will continue to attract workers from <br />85 other counties . <br />86 <br />87 Erle Smith said that Orange County was like a salary seat. <br />88 <br />89 Andy Henry commented that it is evident in the mornings on NC -54 and 15 -501 with traffic being very high that a lot <br />90 of people are coming in to work at UNC and other places. <br />91 <br />92 David Laudicina asked if the employment forecast takes into consideration what the Research Triangle is trying to do, <br />93 which is to add 110,000 new jobs, generating a huge amount of service jobs. <br />94 <br />95 Andy Henry answered that the population total is from the NC demographer and is broken -out by county (20 year <br />96 projection). The MPO stretches that total out to 30 years to get its figures. The employment figures were from Woods <br />97 and Poole, a private company dealing with economic and demographic projections out to 2050. <br />98 <br />99 David Laudicina said that those population projections could be conservative. <br />100 <br />101 Andy Henry responded that upon revisiting some of the projection forecasts, sometimes the projections seem either <br />102 lower or higher, depending on what people expect. <br />103 <br />104 Alex Castro asked why parts of Chatham County are included even though Chatham County is outside of the MPO. <br />105 <br />106 Andy Henry responded that the MPO does include a small portion of Chatham County in its planning area. He added <br />107 that MPO models the whole Triangle region in two ways: the travel demand model and the land use model, inclusive <br />108 of 10 counties. The model extends to Siler City in Chatham County. <br />109 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.