Browse
Search
OUTBoard agenda 011718
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
OUTBoard agenda 011718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 3:30:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/17/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Funding <br />Category <br />Quantitative Data <br />Local Input <br />Division <br />MPO <br />Measurement of the total projected passenger trips compared to the cost of the project to the state <br />MPO <br />Input <br />Input <br />and lifespan of the project. <br />Cost Effectiveness = 15% <br />Impact = 20% <br />Measurement of the total projected passenger trips compared to the cost of the project to the state <br />Regional <br />Measurement of the number trips affected by the project. <br />and lifespan of the project. <br />Impact <br />Efficiency = 15% <br />Demand /Density = 15% <br />15% <br />and lifespan of the project. <br />Division <br />Measurement of the number of service hours devoted to the project compared to the service <br />Demand /Density = 20% <br />Needs <br />population. <br />25% <br />25% <br />Measurement of the ridership growth trend for the previous five years. <br />Efficiency = 10% <br />Impact <br />Impact =15% <br />Total = 70% (Division and Local Input Points account for remaining 30 %) <br />Measurement of the vehicle utilization ratio. <br />Number of trips affected by the project. <br />Cost Effectiveness = 15% <br />Impact = 10% <br />Efficiency = 10% <br />Measurement of the total projected passenger trips compared to the cost of the project to the state <br />Measurement of the number trips affected by the project. <br />Total number of trips as a ratio of the total revenue seat hours. <br />and lifespan of the project. <br />Total = 50% (Division and Local Input Points account for remaining 30 %) <br />Total = 70% (Division and Local Input Points account for remaining 30 %) <br />Public Transit Scoring (Facilities) <br />Public Transit Scoring (Mobility) <br />Cost Effectiveness = 25% <br />Local Input <br />Funding <br />Quantitative Data <br />Measurement of the total projected passenger trips compared to the cost of the project to the state <br />MPO <br />Category <br />and lifespan of the project. <br />Impact = 20% <br />Input <br />Regional <br />Measurement of the number trips affected by the project. <br />Impact <br />Efficiency = 15% <br />15% <br />15% <br />and lifespan of the project. <br />Measurement of efficiency of the project. <br />Demand /Density = 20% <br />Demand /Density = 10% <br />Regional <br />Measurement of the number of total trips as a percentage of the service population. <br />Measurement of the ridership growth trend for the previous five years. <br />15% <br />Impact <br />Impact =15% <br />Total = 70% (Division and Local Input Points account for remaining 30 %) <br />Number of trips affected by the project. <br />Cost Effectiveness = 15% <br />Efficiency = 10% <br />Measurement of the total projected passenger trips compared to the cost of the project to the state <br />Total number of trips as a ratio of the total revenue seat hours. <br />and lifespan of the project. <br />Total = 70% (Division and Local Input Points account for remaining 30 %) <br />Impact = 15% <br />Division <br />Measurement of the number trips affected by the project. <br />Needs <br />Demand /Density = 10% <br />25% <br />25% <br />and lifespan of the project. <br />Measurement of the ridership growth trend for the previous five years. <br />Demand /Density = 10% <br />Efficiency = 10% <br />Division <br />Measurement of the number of total trips as a percentage of the service population. <br />Measurement of efficiency of the project. <br />25% <br />Needs <br />Impact = 10% <br />Total = 50% (Division and Local Input Points account for remaining 50 %) <br />Public Transit Scoring (Mobility) <br />Draft — December 2017 <br />38 <br />Local Input <br />Funding <br />Quantitative Data <br />Division <br />MPO <br />Category <br />Input <br />Input <br />Cost Effectiveness = 25% <br />Measurement of the total projected passenger trips compared to the cost of the project to the state <br />and lifespan of the project. <br />Demand /Density = 20% <br />Regional <br />Measurement of the number of total trips as a percentage of the service population. <br />15% <br />15% <br />Impact <br />Impact =15% <br />Number of trips affected by the project. <br />Efficiency = 10% <br />Total number of trips as a ratio of the total revenue seat hours. <br />Total = 70% (Division and Local Input Points account for remaining 30 %) <br />Cost Effectiveness = 20% <br />Measurement of the total projected passenger trips compared to the cost of the project to the state <br />and lifespan of the project. <br />Demand /Density = 10% <br />Division <br />Measurement of the number of total trips as a percentage of the service population. <br />25% <br />25% <br />Needs <br />Impact = 10% <br />Number of trips affected by the project. <br />Efficiency = 10% <br />Total number of trips as a ratio of the total revenue seat hours. <br />Total = 50% (Division and Local Input Points account for remaining 50 %) <br />Draft — December 2017 <br />38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.