OUTBoard agenda 011718 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Note: TARPO is located in Divisions 7 and 8, both of which use the same "alternative" scoring criteria that differ from NCDOT's standard scoring criteria for the highway mode in the Division Needs category. These alternative criteria will also be used for TARPO's scoring of projects. 11 °cfl R 11 1 (..,, z I rl d 11 l l o j ect 11 k zl l de", i1 Ik iK a A 1p) ll) ir'o zi c�1 i° 111 o i in t A s s i a In r n e In Once all projects in each mode have been scored according to the criteria above, TARPO staff will develop a ranked list of projects within each county and within the region as a whole based on the outcome of the scoring. This ranked list of all projects in all modes will be used to develop the recommended point assignments that are presented to the public for comment and to the RTCC and RTAC for approval. There will be separate rankings for the Regional Impact category and the Division Needs category. The recommendation will call for the two top- scoring projects within each county (regardless of mode) to be allocated 100 points each. Additionally, the six next - highest scoring projects within the region (regardless of county and mode) will also be allocated 100 points each, to reach TARPO's total point allocation of 1400 points. In the event that a county does not have at least two eligible projects, then additional projects will be selected from the top of the list of remaining projects in the other counties. This allows for geographic equity of projects in the region. No projects with a DOT quantitative score less than 10 will be recommended for points. Any project that local jurisdictions specifically request not be assigned points during the countywide project ranking process will not be recommended for points. An example of the ranking process is shown on the next page. TARPO1/2/2018 Draft Prioritization 5.0 Local Point Methodology for Triangle Area RPO — Page 4