Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-20-2006-c5
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 11-20-2006
>
Agenda - 11-20-2006-c5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 9:04:38 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:54:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/20/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
c5
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20061120
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I * <br />ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD • COMMISSIONERS <br />AND <br />PLANNING BOARD <br />PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />I Meeting D. November 20, 200• <br />Action Agenda <br />Item No. C - 5- <br />SUBJECT: Proposed Conservation Cluster Subdivision Perimeter Buffer Text <br />Amendments <br />DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections <br />ATTACHMENT(S.): <br />1. Proposed Ordinance with strike and <br />delete highlights <br />.2. Comparison of existing & proposed <br />regulations map <br />PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) Yes <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />Name Phone Number <br />Craig Benedict, Director 245-2592 <br />Robert P Davis, Planner 111 245-2580 <br />Jennifer Leaf, Planner 1 245-2603 <br />PURPOSE: To hear staff presentation and public comments on proposed subdivision text <br />amendments to Section IV-13-10 D.2 of the Subdivision Regulations. <br />BACKGROUND: The stated purpose of Flexible Development is to preserve agricultural and <br />forestry lands, natural and cultural features, and rural community character that might be lost <br />through conventional development approaches (Section IV-13-10 Sub Regs.). Of the three <br />options available within Flexible Development (Estate Lot, Conservation-Cluster, and Village) <br />the Conservation-Cluster has been the option of choice in the majority of applications. A unique <br />requirement of the Conservation-Cluster option is a *mandatory 100 -foot building setback from <br />the subdivision perimeter. The original intent of this 100 -foot setback was to lessen the impact <br />of higher density clusters of housing on the surrounding, lower density [generagy] dwellings. In <br />rural areas without public sewer this has not been a problem due to the minimum 40,000 square <br />foot lots in the AR and R1 zoning districts (2 acres in Rural Buffer). However, the 100-foot <br />setback has presented design challenges in smaller acreage sub * divisions and also on <br />irregularly shaped tracts. Additionally, there are no planting requirements for the 100-foot <br />building setback, except in cases along public right-of-ways. <br />The 100' building setback requirement in the conservation-cluster option hinders good, compact <br />design in the Transition Areas (I.e. Urban Designated Areas on the Growth Management <br />System map with public water/public sewer potential now or in the future). Where public sewer <br />is provided as a part of the development, the lot sizes may be reduced by 65% of the minimum <br />lot size (from 40,000 sq. ft to 14,000 sq. ft). In these transition areas, higher density housing is <br />anticipated and the 100-foot building setback heavily impacts the 'buildable' area of a proposed <br />subdivision, especially if the tract is small to begin with. Another complication is that the 100 - <br />foot structure setback may be 'in-lot' where the 33% open space criteria have been met <br />elsewhere on the site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.