Browse
Search
CFE agenda 010818
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
CFE agenda 010818
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 9:28:48 AM
Creation date
3/5/2018 9:27:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/8/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
CFE minutes 010818
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Commission for the Environment\Minutes\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GL <br />This is the proposed application area in the <br />Morgan Ann of Jordan Lake (Photo: NC DEQ) <br />In a letter to the Division of Water Resources, the Corps rejected the proposal, worth $1.3 million to SePro. The <br />Corps, which built the reservoir on an old tobacco farm in the 1970s and 1980s, has legal jurisdiction over Jordan <br />Lake. Without its approval, the plan can't proceed. The treatment segment of the project was scheduled to begin in <br />March 2019. <br />And for the first time, the Corps' letter reveals there was a plan in the works to conduct a similar pilot project for <br />Falls Lake. <br />The Jordan Lake plan called for using algaecides and other chemicals, as well as dumping as many as 350 tons of <br />chemically treated clay fill into 300 acres of the Morgan Creek Arm. That amount is for only one treatment, and is <br />similar in scale, the Corps wrote, to a bridge replacement or road widening project. <br />SePro would be unwilling to remove the fill after the pilot program ended, because it would be too expensive, <br />according to the letter. "Cost is not an acceptable justification for not addressing the adverse impact," the Corps <br />countered. <br />feed on them, but cutting into the recreational use of the reservoir. <br />Although the state submitted the 114 -page proposal in October, it was not the Department of Environmental <br />Quality's idea. SePro had hired former House Speaker-turned-lobbyist Harold Brubaker to muscle a $1.3 million <br />appropriation through both charnbers. The legislature responded by slipping in an 11 th -hour provision to earmark <br />The permanent loss of water storage volume, the Corps wrote, "is an <br />Cost is not an <br />unacceptable adverse impact" to all five of the lake's congressionally <br />authorized purposes: water supply, flood control, public recreation, fish <br />acceptable <br />and wildlife, and downstream water quality. <br />justification for not <br />addressing the <br />The chemicals contained in the algaecide could harm aquatic life, and <br />lanthanum, a soft metal compound of phosphorus - locking clay, "would <br />adverse impact <br />likely accumulate in certain tissues offish in the lake" the Corps wrote. In <br />some instances, the chemical harm is unknown, but state officials believe <br />the number of the fish would decrease, harming not only the wildlife that <br />feed on them, but cutting into the recreational use of the reservoir. <br />Although the state submitted the 114 -page proposal in October, it was not the Department of Environmental <br />Quality's idea. SePro had hired former House Speaker-turned-lobbyist Harold Brubaker to muscle a $1.3 million <br />appropriation through both charnbers. The legislature responded by slipping in an 11 th -hour provision to earmark <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.