CFE agenda 010818 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

C. Fewer Harmful Effects Correspond to the Farrington Road Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility In addition to studying different alignment routes, the DEIS reviewed different possible locations for a rail operations and maintenance facility ( "ROMF "), where trains will be serviced and stored, and where the technical operations for the system will be based. The Farrington Road ROMF included in the NEPA Preferred Alternative surpasses each of the alternative ROMF locations. Leigh Village would permanently impair use of the historic Walter Curtis Hudson Farm, and the Patterson Place ROMF is incompatible with the Preferred Alternative New Hope Creek Element ( "NHC 2 "), as well as the perhaps "second best" New Hope Creek route possibility of NHC 1.61 Because the Patterson Place ROMF would rule out these two environmentally - preferable routes, we oppose the Patterson Place ROMF and strongly concur with the NEPA Preferred Alternative's selection of the Farrington ROME While the Cornwallis and Alston Avenue ROMF locations may result in fewer impacts to water resources, and natural resources in the case of the Alston Avenue ROMF, the resulting operational difficulties, higher costs, and community impacts render these locations less desirable to the NEPA Preferred Alternative location. 62 Specifically, the Cornwallis Road location would have significant impacts on the Judea Reform Congregation, Levin Jewish Community Center, and the Lerner Jewish Community Day School .63 The Alston Avenue Location would be located in an area with high low- income and minority populations, result in a net loss of jobs, and displace multiple businesses. 64 Such significant community impacts would undermine the community support and longevity of the D -O LRT project. In sum, the NEPA Preferred Alternative utilizes existing transportation right -of -ways and follows a route that minimizes new impacts to sensitive environmental resources. By sticking close to established transportation corridors, most of the NEPA Preferred Alternative's environmental impacts are to already disturbed environments. As such, we are pleased with the identified NEPA Preferred Alternative and strongly support GoTriangle's continued selection of this route and ROMF location as the NEPA Preferred Alternative. III. GoTriangle Should Continue to Analyze Certain Environmental Impacts and Develop Further Mitigation Measures On the whole, the DEIS carefully and thoroughly documents the possible impacts to natural resources, streams and wetlands, water quality, and air quality within the project area. We are pleased with the consistent recommendation of best management practices to avoid and reduce certain environmental impacts. The below comments applaud some of the specific aspects of the DEIS's discussion of the affected environment and environmental consequences, 61 Id. at 8 -20. 61 Id. at 8- 21 -8 -22. 63 Id. at 8 -21. 64 Id. at 8- 22 -8 -23. 11