Browse
Search
CFE agenda 100917
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
CFE agenda 100917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 9:25:34 AM
Creation date
3/5/2018 9:10:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/9/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
CFE minutes 100917
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Commission for the Environment\Minutes\2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. California <br />In California, decisions on siting wind projects are left to local governments, but projects must undergo a <br />state level environmental review, which includes opportunities for public notification and comment. The <br />California Energy Commission does not regulate wind projects because its authority extends only to thermal <br />power plants over 50 megawatts.92 However, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),93 any <br />project that involves state or local government participation, financing or approval, and has the "potential for <br />resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical <br />change in the environment" must undergo an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). In most cases this would <br />encompass wind projects. Certain projects, including projects located in environmentally sensitive areas or <br />projects that substantially affect wildlife habitats, must also undergo a State Clearinghouse review by other <br />state agencies.94 <br />In the case of Altamont Pass, the first and largest U.S. wind project, the Alameda County Zoning Board of <br />Adjustments issued conditional use permits and did not require an Environmental Impact Report under <br />CEQA. The County claimed a categorical exemption from CEQA, although the CEQA guidelines clearly <br />state that a "categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility <br />that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment. "95 The Altamont Pass wind project, built <br />in the mid 1980s, has received worldwide notoriety for bird deaths. A 2004 study done by the California <br />Energy Commission found that the Altamont Pass turbines kill an estimated 881 to 1,300 birds of prey each <br />year, many of which are endangered or threatened species. 9c The permits were up for renewal in 2004, and <br />although environmental groups and state and federal wildlife agencies presented substantial evidence on the <br />environmental impacts of the turbines and called for an EIR, the County re- issued the permits in 2005, again <br />without an EIR.97 Most wind projects in California, however, undergo the EIR process. <br />E. Virginia <br />In Virginia, wind energy projects must receive local approval as well as a state certificate which entails some <br />level of environmental review. The State of Virginia does not specifically regulate wind power facilities; <br />however, wind facilities fall under State Corporation Commission (SCC) regulation of electric generation <br />facilities. In general, these regulations require the SCC to issue a Certificate of Public Convenience and <br />Necessity (certificate) for construction of electric facilities.9s The SCC's review must consider the effect of the <br />proposed facility on the environmentag and establish conditions to minimize adverse environmental impacts. <br />To this end, the Department of Environmental Quality coordinates the environmental review, ioo which <br />consists of analysis of 14 items. ioi DEQ makes recommendations to the SCC regarding conditions that may <br />be necessary to minimize impacts based on input from various agencies; however, there are no clearly stated <br />criteria that are to be applied to this review. The SCC must notify the public and provide an opportunity for <br />a hearing,102 but there is no requirement for the SCC to consider the input and the timing of the hearing is <br />unspecified. Upon finding that it will not negatively impact reliability or rates and that it is not contrary to <br />the public interest, the SCC must permit construction of a facility. The SCC certificate does not serve as a <br />consolidated state permit, and projects must also obtain other necessary state or federal permits, in addition to <br />local permits. <br />Appendix C 191 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.