Orange County NC Website
of their natural range coupled with the uncertainty in <br />projected future habitat distributions may make trans - <br />location of species controversial. Lawler et al. (2010) <br />provide a graphical representation of certain types of <br />management actions that are dependent on the direc- <br />tion or magnitude of climate changes, highlighting <br />those actions that are more and less robust to uncer- <br />tainties associated with impact projections. (Figure <br />5.7) To be successful all actions must be coupled with <br />careful and rigorous monitoring, analysis, and re -eval- <br />uation as further information becomes available. <br />Figure 5 -7. Management actions for addressing climate change, plotted with respect to the relative degree <br />of uncertainty associated with their outcomes. Inherent uncertainty (x axis) is the uncertainty associated <br />with a management action, irrespective of climate change. The uncertainty due to climate change (y axis) <br />is a measure of how dependant the outcome of a management action is on a particular direction or magni- <br />tude of climatic change. Actions at the bottom and top of the plot are, respectively, more and less robust to <br />uncertainties in climate- change impact projections. The plot is necessarily a generalization — specific manage- <br />ment actions of one type or another may be associated with relatively more or less uncertainty than the levels <br />depicted here (Source: Lawler et al. 2010, (D The Ecological Society of America, used with permission). <br />