Orange County NC Website
26 <br />1 Chair Dorosin said yes, at least through the May 1s` deadline, and if the Board felt <br />2 Carrboro should ultimately not be involved, then Carrboro would consider stepping back. <br />3 Commissioner Price said it would be good to speak with St. Paul's Village. <br />4 Chair Dorosin agreed, and thanked staff from across the County for working hard on this <br />5 project. <br />6 <br />7 7. Reports <br />8 <br />9 a. Orange County Sheriff's Office Portable Audio /Video Recorders Policy <br />10 The Board discussed the Sheriff's Portable Audio /Video (body -worn cameras) Records <br />11 Policy. <br />12 <br />13 BACKGROUND: <br />14 At the February 6, 2018 Board of Orange County Commissioners meeting, the Board received <br />15 a presentation on Motorola's Digital Evidence Management Solutions <br />16 (DEMS) and introduced the SI -500 Body Camera and Command Central Vault. Orange County <br />17 Sheriff Charles S. Blackwood responded to questions from Board members about the possibility <br />18 of equipping Sheriff's Deputies with these body -worn cameras (BWC). During the conversation, <br />19 the Board expressed interest in revisiting the discussion after having a chance to review the <br />20 Sheriff's Portable Audio /Video Records Policy, which was distributed at the meeting. <br />21 <br />22 Jennifer Galassi, Legal Advisor, said the policy tracks with State law, as well as best <br />23 practices. She said many of the parameters of the policy are already established based on the <br />24 relatively new North Carolina General Statue, which excludes recordings from the public <br />25 records designation, and sets out the process for seeking disclosure, and /or release of <br />26 recordings. She said the State's records and retention schedule for Sheriffs' offices, which this <br />27 body adopted, and the office adheres to for retention policies. She said this is the framework <br />28 into which the policy fits. She said the statute requires all law enforcement agencies that use <br />29 body cameras to have a policy that addresses the use of those devices, and places restrictions <br />30 on when a recording may be reviewed and released, both internally and to the public. <br />31 Jennifer Galassi said the statute does not address what the policy must address. She <br />32 said there are issues such as when to activate the body -worn camera; what should guide the <br />33 Sheriff's decision to allow disclosure, when that request is made; or when the Sheriff should <br />34 seek a court order to release a recording. She said all of these areas are within the Sheriff's <br />35 purview to establish in his /her policy. <br />36 Jennifer Galassi said she is here this evening to entertain the BOCC's comments, and <br />37 suspects most will center around social justice and issues of civil liberties. She said it is <br />38 important to remember that this policy has not yet been issued, as the Sheriff's office does not <br />39 yet have the body -worn cameras. She said all policies are open to revision and changes when <br />40 laws change, or better practices are encountered. She highlighted some issues of particular <br />41 interest to the Board: <br />42 • This is just another piece of equipment that will be assigned to their officers. As with <br />43 any equipment, the officer is responsible for insuring, prior to going into service, that it is <br />44 in good working order. <br />45 • The policy will outline the specific situations when the body -worn cameras should be <br />46 activated. The policy states that not every scenario can be foreseen, but it focuses on <br />47 two touchstones of when a recording should begin: when it is appropriate or valuable to <br />48 record the incident. An officer is called upon to exercise his /her discretion when making <br />49 that determination. Good training will be very important <br />