Agenda 8-a - Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

21 1 Unit Output Potential 2 3 Development Area – Small 4 • Advantages 5 o Additional preserve 6 o Wildlife corridor– landscape connectivity 7 o Fewest traffic impacts 8 • Disadvantages 9 o Fewer units possible: 138 -690 compared to large development area 10 o Less development to offset infrastructure /affordability 11 12 Development /Preservation Areas (pie charts) 13 14 Density- photos 15 - Low -4 -6 units per acre 16 - Medium -6 – 10 units /acre 17 - Large- 10 -20 units per acre 18 19 Unit Potential by Density (graph) 20 21 Land Uses (photos) 22 - Residential 23 - Commercial 24 - Mixed Use 25 26 Mixed Use /Mixed Income Affordable Housing Potential – Headwaters Existing (table) 27 (If mixed income development – % of affordable housing shown at bottom left) 28 29 General Conclusions 30 Headwaters Existing vs. Headwaters Modified 31 o Modified allows continuous environmental corridor with continuous ownership 32 o Modified produces larger development areas and unit outputs 33 o Modified yields less area for preservation and land banking 34 o Modified needs to be ground verified 35 o Modified presents access challenges by separating development areas 36 Development Area 37 o Larger development areas produce more potential units except in small area 38 where unit outputs are approximately the same 39 o Larger development areas have less preservation areas 40 o Larger areas allow more potential for other development to subsidize 41 infrastructure costs and affordable units 42 Density 43 o Higher density produces more potential units 44 o Higher density allows more opportunity to offset costs of infrastructure and 45 affordable unit costs 46 o Low to moderate density more consistent with current neighborhood 47 • Land Use 48 o Mixed use /mixed income provides opportunity to offset infrastructure and 49 affordable unit costs 50 o Mixed use /mixed income yields fewer affordable units