Orange County NC Website
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />17 <br />current environmental conditions, elements of the 2002 Joint Governments' Resolution, the <br />Rogers Road Task Force report, the Mapping Our Community's Future report, and previous <br />land use discussions. These three alternatives are contained in Attachment 3. <br />In addition to the high, medium, and low development intensity scenarios, the Mayors and Chair <br />requested an examination of the entire Greene Tract, including the Headwaters Preserve, in an <br />effort to preserve the most environmentally sensitive areas and to develop the most appropriate <br />areas of the entire 164 acre Tract. As a result, staff amended the proposed conceptual plan, <br />reconfiguring the Headwaters Preserve and the jointly owned areas. This reconfiguration <br />maintains the same total acreage for each of the areas but aligns them differently. The <br />reconfigured tracts were drafted with environmental staff from the Town of Chapel Hill, the <br />Town of Carrboro, and Orange County in order to create new parcels which endeavored to <br />protect environmental features and habitats located on site. The proposed reconfigured <br />Headwaters Preserve area alternatives are also contained in Attachment 3. <br />Attachment 4 includes land use and density outcomes for the different alternatives. Attachment <br />5 includes potential affordable housing outputs based on different affordable housing <br />proportions. <br />Greene Tract Conceptual Plans <br />Information on Factors Considered During Creation Process <br />The staff - created conceptual plans for the Greene Tract are a result of several months of <br />iterations and input from a variety of staff from the three jurisdictions. While planning staffs <br />were the lead on creating the conceptual plans, input was also sought and incorporated from <br />environmental and stormwater staffs. <br />The following information addresses some anticipated questions regarding why the conceptual <br />plans are presented as they are. <br />Environmental Features <br />Although the Greene Tract lies entirely within the planning jurisdiction of the Town of <br />Chapel Hill, 104 acres of the Greene Tract are co -owned by Orange County and the Towns of <br />Chapel Hill and Carrboro while 60 acres are owned solely by Orange County. <br />Planning staffs chose to apply the most stringent development regulation of the three <br />jurisdictions when determining stream and wetland buffers and preservation of other <br />environmental features such as forest types. For example, if one jurisdiction requires a 50 -foot <br />stream buffer and another requires a 65 -foot stream buffer, a 65 -foot stream buffer was used <br />as the stream buffer on the conceptual plan. <br />The Upland Hardwood Forest areas were slated for preservation as at least one jurisdiction <br />would normally request /require preservation of these types of forests if a development proposal <br />were made. <br />Road Configuration <br />All previous planning efforts of the Greene Tract /Rogers Road area have strongly stated that <br />Purefoy Drive and /or Lizzie Lane should not be the only access to the Greene <br />Tract. Connections to the south, north, and /or east must be made. The early iterations of maps <br />(not included in materials) sought to avoid a stream crossing and connected to <br />Merin Road, near the southeast corner of the Greene Tract, by traversing the area <br />between two stream buffer areas. However, this configuration was revised as <br />