Browse
Search
Agenda 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
Agenda - 03-08-2018
>
Agenda 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 3:05:03 PM
Creation date
3/2/2018 2:22:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/8/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Agenda Item
8-a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />16 <br />Todd LoFrese said this information will be brought back to the BOCC at a later date. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos clarified that this this cost is not currently part of the <br />expansion budget. <br />Todd LoFrese said that is correct. <br />Commissioner Rich referred to the healthcare plan, and asked if it is purchased through <br />the State. <br />Todd LoFrese said it is prescribed to CHCCS, and it is the State health plan, and is not <br />open for negotiation. <br />Commissioner Price referred to the priority expansion request, and asked if it only refers <br />to for operational expenses, and not capital. <br />Todd LoFrese said yes. <br />Chair Dorosin said having these early presentations was a good idea that came out of <br />the school collaboration meetings. <br />5. Public Hearings <br />NONE <br />6. Regular Agenda <br />a. Greene Tract Conceptual Plans <br />The Board considered development and preservation alternatives for the Greene Tract <br />and authorize staff to communicate the Board's preferences to the Towns of Chapel Hill and <br />Carrboro. These preferences include decisions on: <br />1. Reconfiguration of the Headwaters Preserve area; <br />2. Size of the development and preservation areas within the Greene Tract; <br />3. Density of the development area; <br />4. Land uses and affordable housing preferences in the development area such as <br />a. Single use (residential) versus mixed use development (residential and <br />commercial) <br />b. Affordable housing versus mixed income /market rate housing <br />c. Goals for the number or proportion of affordable units <br />Upon receipt of feedback from both towns, County staff - in concert with town staffs - will <br />prepare a draft resolution for future approval by the Board of Commissioners, the Chapel Hill <br />Town Council and the Carrboro Board of Aldermen to codify the preferences /input from all three <br />entities. With adoption by all three governing boards, the resulting resolution would supersede <br />the 2002 Resolution that outlined the County and Towns' intentions for developing the Greene <br />Tract. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />The Greene Tract is a 164 acre parcel of which 104 acres is jointly owned by Orange County, <br />Chapel Hill, and Carrboro. The remaining sixty (60) acres is owned by Orange <br />County and has been designated as the Headwaters Preserve. <br />Last year, the owners of the jointly owned portion of the Greene Tract agreed to have the <br />Mayors and BOCC Chair consider different preservation and development options for the <br />property. This discussion resulted in three alternatives that illustrate high, medium, and low <br />development intensities. All of the alternatives include an elementary school site, a site for a <br />future park, the preservation of significant environmental and cultural areas, and a preliminary <br />road network and infrastructure design. The three alternatives also consider the project area's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.