Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />15 <br />Chair Dorosin: Great. We will note for the record that in the column that says "Planning Board/ <br />staff recommendations" on all of these it's a yes, that they've been met. <br />Patrick Mallett: It is, yes. And that's attachment number 4. <br />Chair Dorosin asked if the Planning Board Vice -chair (Tony Blake) or other members of the <br />Planning Board if the audience wanted to offer additional comment. <br />They did not <br />Chair Dorosin asked if there were any other questions for staff, the applicant, or other <br />individual(s) who have offered testimony /evidence. <br />There were none. <br />John Roberts: If we could just get an affirmative statement from the Applicant that the <br />Applicant has been presented with, and understands the conditions that are being <br />recommended here. <br />Brian Quinlan: We've seen the conditions attached to the permit, and we acknowledge them. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner McKee to close the <br />public hearing. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Chair Dorosin indicated the BOCC will first need to take action on the Special Use Permit <br />findings of fact. The findings of fact have been organized per relevant UDO sections to aid in <br />making motions to approve or deny. The cadence on taking action should be as follows <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Burroughs, seconded by Commissioner Price to affirm <br />the recommendation of the Planning Board and Staff concerning the application's compliance <br />with the provisions of Section(s) 2.2 and 2.7.3 of the Orange County Unified Development <br />Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 9 (page 220) of the abstract package. Second. Vote. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Burroughs, seconded by Commissioner Rich to affirm <br />the recommendation of the Planning Board and Staff concerning the application's compliance <br />with the provisions of Section 2.7.5 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as <br />detailed within Attachment 9 (page 221) of the abstract package <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />