Orange County NC Website
Climate Change Assessment for Water Resources Region 03 South Atlantic -Gulf <br />Runoff change ttomi GCMs & 81 6 tMs, W71-2, 100 vs. 197 1 -2001 <br />15 "'WJZW 'W M ' <br />K 12A* VWK <br />AN `µ <br />We <br />Or <br />60*N <br />W. <br />WIN <br />, <br />" <br />H <br />1' "''W 1201 ' M "+fin ,1V <br />Y <br />E `K 1 f E IN <br />1W, <br />_2W -161 <br />- -120 40 -40 <br />Q 401 <br />so Iii, 16+11 <br />20) <br />Figure 3.15. Ensemble mean runoff projections (mm /year) for A2 greenhouse gas emissions <br />scenario, changes in annual runoff, 2085 vs. 1985. The South Atlantic -Gulf Region is within <br />the red oval (Hagemann et al., 2013). <br />One method for addressing uncertainty in climate change projections is to use probabilistic <br />modeling approaches (CDM, 2011). Such studies are described by Wang et al. (2013a) and Wu <br />et al. (2014). In the first study, the authors apply four GCMs across three greenhouse gas <br />emission scenarios, in combination with a mechanistic hydrologic model, to quantify future <br />changes in streamflow as a result of climate change. Results are presented in the form of a <br />cumulative distribution function (Figure 3.16) and show a high likelihood of higher flows in the <br />future compared to the past, particularly for the wetter projection scenarios. The driest scenarios, <br />however, show a nearly equal likelihood of decreasing flows as increasing flows. In the Wu et al. <br />(2014) study, the full suite of CMIP3 GCM projections were used, in combination with a lumped <br />rainfall- runoff model, within a probabilistic framework to project future changes in streamflow <br />for a watershed in North Carolina (Coweeta Laboratory). They compared future (2070 — 2099) <br />projections with historical (1961 — 1990) data. <br />Probabilistic results (Figure 3.17) suggest a likely increase in winter streamflow (up to c. 30 %) <br />across a range of assumed greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Results are mixed for the other <br />seasons. Summer flows are projected to likely decrease under the A2 (worst case) scenario but <br />likely increase (slightly) under the B1 (best case) scenario. Spring flows appear just as likely to <br />be lower as higher for the A2 and A I B scenarios but more likely to be higher under the B1 <br />scenario. The value of probabilistic approaches is evident when comparing this study with a <br />deterministic study by Qi et al. (2009), also focused on North Carolina streamflow changes. The <br />Qi et al. study presented projections from only two GCMs and a single hydrologic model. One <br />set of results predicts a small and gradual increase in streamflow through the 21" century, while <br />the other predicts a small decrease in streamflow for the same time period. <br />USACE Institute for Water Resources 32 January 9, 2015 <br />