Orange County NC Website
In the sugarcane region of El Salvador, as much as one -fifth of the population has chronic kidney disease, the <br />presumed result of dehydration from working the fields they were able to comfortably harvest as recently as <br />two decades ago. Photo: Heartless Machine <br />Humans, like all mammals, are heat engines; surviving means having to continually cool off, like panting dogs. For that, the temperature needs to <br />be low enough for the air to act as a kind of refrigerant, drawing heat off the skin so the engine can keep pumping. At seven degrees of warming, <br />that would become impossible for large portions of the planet's equatorial band, and especially the tropics, where humidity adds to the problem; in <br />the jungles of Costa Rica, for instance, where humidity routinely tops 90 percent, simply moving around outside when it's over 105 degrees <br />Fahrenheit would be lethal. And the effect would be fast: Within a few hours, a human body would be cooked to death from both inside and out. <br />Climate- change skeptics point out that the planet has warmed and cooled many times before, but the climate window that has allowed for human <br />life is very narrow, even by the standards of planetary history. At 11 or 12 degrees of warming, more than half the world's population, as distributed <br />today, would die of direct heat. Things almost certainly won't get that hot this century, though models of unabated emissions do bring us that far <br />eventually. This century, and especially in the tropics, the pain points will pinch much more quickly even than an increase of seven degrees. The <br />key factor is something called wet -bulb temperature, which is a term of measurement as home - laboratory-kit as it sounds: the heat registered on a <br />thermometer wrapped in a damp sock as it's swung around in the air (since the moisture evaporates from a sock more quickly in dry air, this single <br />number reflects both heat and humidity). At present, most regions reach a wet -bulb maximum of 26 or 27 degrees Celsius; the true red line for <br />habitability is 35 degrees. What is called heat stress comes much sooner. <br />Actually, we're about there already. Since 1980, the planet has experienced a 50 -fold increase in the number of places experiencing dangerous or <br />extreme heat; a bigger increase is to come. The five warmest summers in Europe since 1500 have all occurred since 2002, and soon, the IPCC <br />warns, simply being outdoors that time of year will be unhealthy for much of the globe. Even if we meet the Paris goals of two degrees warming, <br />cities like Karachi and Kolkata will become close to uninhabitable, annually encountering deadly heat waves like those that crippled them in 2015. <br />At four degrees, the deadly European heat wave of 2003, which killed as many as 2,000 people a day, will be a normal summer. At six, according <br />to an assessment focused only on effects within the U.S, from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, summer labor of any kind <br />would become impossible in the lower Mississippi Valley, and everybody in the country east of the Rockies would be under more heat stress than <br />anyone, anywhere, in the world today. As Joseph Romm has put it in his authoritative primer Clrniate Change: What Evewyvne heeds to Know, heat <br />stress in New York City would exceed that of present -day Bahrain, one of the planet's hottest spots, and the temperature in Bahrain "would induce <br />hyperthermia in even sleeping humans:' The high -end IPCC estimate, remember, is two degrees warmer still. By the end of the century, the World <br />Bank has estimated, the coolest months in tropical South America, Africa, and the Pacific are likely to be warmer than the warmest months at the <br />end of the 20th century. Air - conditioning can help but will ultimately only add to the carbon problem; plus, the climate - controlled malls of the Arab <br />emirates aside, it is not remotely plausible to wholesale air - condition all the hottest parts of the world, many of them also the poorest. And indeed, <br />the crisis will be most dramatic across the Middle East and Persian Gulf, where in 2015 the heat index registered temperatures as high as 163 <br />degrees Fahrenheit. As soon as several decades from now, the hajj will become physically impossible for the 2 million Muslims who make the <br />pilgrimage each year. <br />It is not just the hajj, and it is not just Mecca; heat is already killing us. In the sugarcane region of El Salvador, as much as one -fifth of the <br />population has chronic kidney disease, including over a quarter of the men, the presumed result of dehydration from working the fields they were <br />able to comfortably harvest as recently as two decades ago. With dialysis, which is expensive, those with kidney failure can expect to live five <br />years; without it, life expectancy is in the weeks. Of course, heat stress promises to pummel us in places other than our kidneys, too. As I type that <br />sentence, in the California desert in mid -June, it is 121 degrees outside my door. It is not a record high. <br />III. The End of Food <br />Praying for cornfields in the tundra. <br />Climates differ and plants vary, but the basic rule for staple cereal crops grown at optimal temperature is that for every degree of warming, yields <br />decline by 10 percent. Some estimates run as high as 15 or even 17 percent. Which means that if the planet is five degrees warmer at the end of <br />the century, we may have as many as 50 percent more people to feed and 50 percent less grain to give them. And proteins are worse: It takes 16 <br />calories of grain to produce just a single calorie of hamburger meat, butchered from a cow that spent its life polluting the climate with methane farts. <br />Pollyannaish plant physiologists will point out that the cereal -crop math applies only to those regions already at peak growing temperature, and <br />they are right theoretically, a warmer climate will make it easier to grow corn in Greenland. But as the pathbreaking work by Rosamond Naylor <br />and David Battisti has shown, the tropics are already too hot to efficiently grow grain, and those places where grain is produced today are already <br />at optimal growing temperature —which means even a small warming will push them down the slope of declining productivity. And you can't easily <br />