Orange County NC Website
projections are not based on downscaled models and, <br />as a result, do not capture spatial variability at finer <br />scales. Relatively few studies have dealt specifically <br />with projected hydrologic trends in the southeast- <br />ern United States and this remains an area in need <br />of future research. Both spatial and seasonal vari- <br />ability will greatly affect local systems, the latter of <br />which will not be captured in projections of annual <br />averages. An earlier study (Cruise et al. 1999) used <br />downscaled data from the Hadley Center GCM and <br />a simple regionalized stochastic stream flow model <br />to examine the impacts of climate change on water <br />quality in the southeastern United States. Although, <br />their hydrologic model relied on a number of simpli- <br />fied assumptions and is therefore of limited applica- <br />tion, their results illustrate the potential variability <br />across wet and dry season stream flow conditions that <br />are not captured in projections of annual averages. <br />® , , m 4. <br />oU.. V'11714 <br />m w <br /># <br />"W11111 J1 <br />41 151% <br />hy o- <br />l <br />,z <br />*6 <br />MI <br />y i <br />ru, ` 'V M <br />, <br />Oil <br />. <br />45 ll <br />Figure 4.10 Median changes in runoff interpolated to USGS water resources regions from Milly et al. (20 05) <br />from 24 pairs of GCM simulations for 2041 -2060 relative to 1901 -1970. Percentages are fraction of 24 runs for <br />which differences had some sign as the 24 -run median. Results replotted from Milly et al. (2005) by Dr. PC. D. <br />Milly, USGS. <br />Figure 2 -6. Mid - century projected changes in runoff for U.S. regions (Source: Lettenmaier et al. 2008). <br />