Orange County NC Website
view last week. If so, the campaign would reach more than ( :// .- <br />=*MM �,, <br />ence teachers <br />Accompanying the materials is a cover letter (https://www.document - <br />cloud.org/ documents /35264.15 - Heartland- Institute - letter -to -e ucators.htmi) <br />from Lennie .larratt, project manager of Heartland's Center for Transforming Ed- <br />ucation. He asks teachers to "consider the possibility" that the science is not set- <br />tled. "If that's the case, then students would be better served by letting them <br />know a vibrant debate is taking place among scientists;' he writes. The letter <br />also points teachers to an online guide to using the DVD in their classrooms. <br />The Heartland initiative dismisses multiple (http://iopscience.iop.org/arti- <br />c I e/1 0.10 88/1748-9326/8/2/024024/m eta) studies (http://journals.sagepub. - <br />com/doi/10.1177/0270467616634958) showing scientists are in near unanimous <br />agreement that humans are changing the climate. Even if human activity is con- <br />tributing to climate change, the book argues, it "would probably not be harmful, <br />because many areas of the world would benefit from or adjust to climate <br />change" <br />The campaign elicited immediate derision from the National Center for Science <br />Education (NCSE), a nonprofit in Oakland, California that monitors climate <br />change education in classrooms. <br />"It's not science, but it's dressed up to look like science;' said NCSE executive di- <br />rector Ann Reid. "It's clearly intended to confuse teachers" <br />It's too early to know how the materials will be used in schools around the coun- <br />try. There aren't uniform standards for teaching climate change, and the subject <br />