Browse
Search
CFE agenda 050916
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
CFE agenda 050916
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 11:06:45 AM
Creation date
3/2/2018 11:05:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/9/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
CFE minutes 050916
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Commission for the Environment\Minutes\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`Black swan technology' <br />Still, NET Power has attracted some high - profile environmental advocates, as well as prestigious <br />industrial partners. Tim Profeta, director of Duke University's Il chop la Ilirh titute of IErMir irhirneintal <br />P Illi y lrl)o utoin , is chairman of 8 Rivers Capital's board of advisers. <br />He acknowledges the tradeoffs but said NET Power is a "worthy bargain." <br />"It is truly a black swan technology that could change the game in power generation," Profeta said. <br />"The company expects it will become the preferred technology for power generation." <br />Another supporter is John Thompson, the Fossil Transition Project director at the Boston -based <br />CIIeairh Xir ..II'asI I:: it e. <br />"If this technology works, it creates an entirely new pathway to economically cut CO2 at a massive <br />scale in a very short period of time," Thompson said. "Even if half of what they claim pans out, it's a <br />big deal. If 25 percent of what they claim pans out, it's still potentially important." <br />The technology in question is called the , I1airn Cy lle, in which natural gas is not burned with air, but <br />with a blend of pure oxygen and carbon dioxide. In this combustion process, the natural gas, oxygen <br />and carbon dioxide burn at a pressure more than 10 times the pressure used in a conventional gas <br />turbine. <br />This thermodynamic feat, which will be tested under real -life conditions next year in La Porte, Texas, <br />approximates a rocket engine and has never been attempted by the power industry. Unlike a <br />disposable rocket booster, however, the NET Power combustor would have to operate reliably for <br />the duration of a power plant's expected Iifespan, anywhere from 25 to 50 years. <br />"The technical challenge here lies in designing durable hardware capable of thousands of hours of <br />continuous operation and efficient combustion over the range of conditions required in a power <br />plant," according to a paper presented at the June 2015 proceedings of the Airneir9icain 115o6e y of <br />�:�liineeir ..Il'uirlb Expo in Montreal, Canada. <br />Il�al���� it °n li�� II I�::: it °ha. <br />The ASME paper's presenters are researchers at the Toshiba Corp., one of NET Power's corporate <br />partners in the zero - emissions venture. Another partner is Chicago -based IExe oirh G. oirp iratoirh, the <br />nation's largest operator of nuclear power plants. <br />Also involved is the Ch cag III3ir9 :Ige & Ilir irh Co,, a construction conglomerate commonly known as <br />CB &I, which inherited its share of the NET Power project in 2013 when it acquired one of the original <br />partners, the Shaw Group, a global engineering and construction firm. <br />That makes NET Power a virtual company without a staff of its own, drawing on outside experts and <br />business partners for its intellectual property and R &D. <br />Disposing of the CO2 <br />A logistical challenge for NET Power will be the disposal of carbon dioxide. NET Power says utilities <br />that build its power plants could sell the CO2 they capture to energy companies for dill expo I iratoirh. <br />The other option is duirnpliir g lit uirhdeirgir air d in regions with adequate geological formations for <br />permanent deep injection. <br />Currently, injecting CO2 underground — called equestiratoirh — has been tried in pilot projects but <br />remains too costly to be adopted as an industry practice. That's because capturing and compressing <br />carbon dioxide at a conventional power plant would require multimillion - dollar retrofits. The NET <br />Power plant skips the retrofit stage because it is designed and built to compress and capture the <br />gas. <br />The other option, advain ed dill irecoveiry, already represents rheaidy 3 Ipeir eint of U.S. onshore oil <br />production. But this carbon dioxide is not sourced from the utility industry. Rather, the energy <br />industry obtains its CO2 from a handful of natural geologic domes where the gas has naturally <br />accumulated over eons. NET Power says its power plants can supply CO2 as well as the geologic <br />domes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.