Browse
Search
CFE agenda 121415
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
CFE agenda 121415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 10:51:13 AM
Creation date
3/2/2018 10:47:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/14/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
CFE minutes 121415
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Commission for the Environment\Minutes\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
53 <br />(RFQ) to select a firm to complete this required scientific study. <br />The RFQ will be released for peer review /comment by November <br />23, 2015_ As part of this process staff will be reaching out to the <br />Upper Neuse River Basin Association (UNRBA) who may be able <br />to provide assistance. <br />At this time staff is unsure how much this study will cost but <br />estimates range from approximately $40,000.00 to $80,000.00. It <br />should be noted funds for this study do not exist within the <br />Planning Department budget. <br />This study needs to be completed and submitted to the EMC by <br />August of 2016. <br />The EMC has 90 days to take action on the request and should <br />make a final decision by November of 2016. <br />It has also been suggested by State staff we submit formal <br />notification by February 1, 2016 of our intention to complete and <br />submit a scientific study for review. <br />This is the exception we are pursuing to maintain our current <br />standards as written. <br />2. Local governments shall not treat land within identified riparian buffers area as if <br />the land is: `the property of the State or any of its subdivisions unless the land or <br />an interest therein has been acquired by the State or its subdivisions by a <br />conveyance or by eminent domain'. <br />STAFF COMMENT. Staff believes we already comply with this <br />standard. <br />3. Riparian buffer areas are required to be denoted on subdivision plats. <br />STAFF COMMENT: Staff believes we already comply with this <br />standard. <br />It should be known, however, State law does not require this area <br />to be surveyed (i.e. established by actual field location /delineation <br />by a surveyor). All the surveyor has to do is denote the <br />approximate required buffer area. We may have to withdraw the <br />survey requirement. <br />4. When riparian buffers are located within designated common areas or open <br />space areas located within a minor /major subdivision each abutting parcel shall <br />be viewed as having an equal interest in that buffer area. The County is required <br />to allow adjacent lots to `count' this buffer area towards lot size, density, <br />perimeter buffer, and conservation purposes. <br />STAFF COMMENT. Staff believes we already comply with this <br />standard. <br />5. Staff interprets the Session Law as prohibiting the County from requiring property <br />owners from voluntarily agreeing to more restrictive riparian buffer standards in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.