Orange County NC Website
OWASA's Comments on Orange County's Draft Changes to the UDO Regarding Impervious <br />Surface Limits in Water Supply Watersheds <br />May 6, 2015 <br />Page 2 <br />a) implement an infiltration best management practice (BMP) approved by DENR; <br />b) hire an engineer to evaluate the infiltration capacity of the soil and design the BMP in <br />accordance with the State's stormwater manual; <br />c) complete a stormwater operation and maintenance agreement and have the document <br />recorded with the Register of Deeds; and <br />d) assume all financial and legal responsibility for the BMP. <br />The County staff s draft amendments also include an increase in the allowable impervious surface <br />limit for non - residential development within the Protected Watershed area in the University Lake <br />watershed, which would make such requirements uniform for both the Cane Creek Reservoir and <br />University Lake watersheds. <br />COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE UDO <br />OWASA does not believe the County's consideration to amend the UDO as currently drafted <br />will result in "backsliding" from current water supply protection efforts. We believe the draft <br />changes are consistent with early recommendations from watershed management studies for <br />the University Lake and Cane Creek Reservoir watersheds, and meet the Cane Creek <br />Watershed Management Study's two highest goals which are protecting public health, and <br />minimizing impacts on County residents who are not OWASA customers. This conclusion is <br />predicated on the assumption that development densities and riparian buffer requirements are <br />not relaxed. The draft amendments would limit impervious surface at thresholds higher than <br />currently allowed only with an infiltration BMP that would mimic the existing hydrology of <br />the land. This combination of strategies could be as protective of water quality in the water <br />supply reservoirs as current requirements assuming the BMP is properly designed, constructed, <br />and maintained. Since the draft ordinance revision requires an engineer to design the BMP, it <br />is likely that the associated BMP would be designed properly. <br />2. While the draft UDO requires the landowner to develop a maintenance agreement and record <br />it with the Register of Deeds, it is critical to ensure that the required annual inspections occur. <br />We strongly recommend that Orange County implement an ongoing program and provide the <br />funding and staff resources necessary to ensure that the mandatory inspections and <br />maintenance of such BMPs will occur. The program should include a process that would occur <br />if a BMP no longer functioned properly and the owner decided not to repair or replace the <br />BMP. We also recommend that the County evaluate staffing and funding periodically to <br />possibly include a landowner- funded inspection program; more landowners may enroll in the <br />program over time, and more BMPs may require repairs or replacement. <br />3. We recommend that 4.2.8(C)(3) clarify that a licensed engineer be required to design the BMP. <br />This would help ensure that a professional engineer with expertise in stormwater management <br />would design the BMP and sign and seal the design. <br />4. We commend Orange County for including both a protective density requirement and stringent <br />impervious surface requirement, and believe both should remain. The density /minimum lot <br />size provisions are the foundation of our successful local water supply protection program. <br />