Browse
Search
CFE agenda 020915
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
CFE agenda 020915
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 10:25:48 AM
Creation date
3/2/2018 10:24:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/9/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
CFE minutes 020915
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Commission for the Environment\Minutes\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
these really big effects over time." <br />It's an 'overestimate' <br />The social cost of carbon is used in the cost - benefit analysis of some federal regulations. If the <br />impact of emissions is deemed expensive for society, it could justify more aggressive policies to <br />reduce their release by industry. Opponents of climate action criticized the Obama administration <br />for raising the social cost of carbon in 2013 by almost 50 percent. <br />William Pizer, a Duke University professor and former Obama administration official who has <br />worked on the estimate, applauded the Stanford researchers for applying updated observations into <br />their carbon estimates. He and several other former Obama advisers say the administration should <br />improve its use of updated science when establishing the price. <br />But Pizer also questioned the methodology of the Stanford analysis. The empirical research it relied <br />on tracked short -term temperature spikes and their impacts on nations' economies -- not long -term <br />trends that might show permanent economic reductions. <br />"To me, it just seems like it has to be an overestimate," Pizer said of the Stanford result of $220. <br />"I think it's great they're doing this," he added. "I just think this is another data point that someone <br />needs to weigh as they're trying to figure out what the right social cost of carbon is. But this isn't like <br />a definitive new answer." <br />Moore acknowledged the uncertainties in her research. For example, she noted that there's not <br />enough evidence to know if climate change will continue to have outsized impacts on poorer <br />countries or if as their economies grow they'll be able to adapt and decrease their damage. <br />A grimmer outcome consists of "biophysical temperature thresholds" -- the idea that the heat will <br />prevent large economic advances. Both scenarios effect the speed and aggressiveness with which <br />emissions should be reduced -- and the price of their social cost of carbon. <br />Moore hopes the new research will help inform the administration that a larger spectrum of <br />damages should be considered when establishing the monetary estimate. <br />Cli ate Wire is written and produced by the staff of E &E Publishing, L.L.C. It is designed to provide <br />comprehensive, daily coverage of all aspects of climate change issues. From international agreements can <br />carbon emissions to alternative energy technologies to state and federal GHG programs, Climate Wire plugs <br />readers into the information they need to stay abreast of this sprawling, complex issue. <br />E &E Publishing, LLC <br />122 C St. NW, Ste. 722, Wash., D.C. 20001 <br />Phone: 202-628-6500 Fax: 202-737-5299 <br />www.eenews.net <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.