Orange County NC Website
where it is currently in excess to areas where the <br />soil is naturally P -poor may simultaneously boost <br />global crop production and reduce the transgres- <br />sion of the regional -level P boundary (3, 52, 54). <br />The N boundary has been taken from the com- <br />prehensive analysis of de Vries et al. (5), which <br />proposed a PB for eutrophication of aquatic eco- <br />systems of 62 Tg N year' from industrial and <br />intentional biological N fixation, using the most <br />stringent water quality criterion. As for the P <br />boundary, a few agricultural regions of very high <br />N application rates are the main contributors to <br />the transgression of this boundary (Fig. 2 and <br />fig. S5B). This suggests that a redistribution of N <br />could simultaneously boost global crop produc- <br />tion and reduce the transgression of the regional- <br />level boundary. <br />Because the major anthropogenic perturba- <br />tion of both the N and P cycles arises from fertil- <br />izer application, we can analyze the links between <br />the independently determined N and P bounda- <br />ries in an integrated way based on the N:P ratio <br />in the growing plant tissue of agricultural crops. <br />Applying this ratio, which is on average 11.8 (55), <br />to the P boundary (6.2 Tg P year-) gives an N <br />boundary of 73 Tg N year'. Conversely, applying <br />the ratio to the N boundary (62 Tg N years) gives <br />a P boundary of 5.3 Tg P years. The small dif- <br />ferences between the boundaries derived using <br />the N:P ratio and those calculated independent- <br />ly, which are likely nonsignificant differences <br />given the precision of the data available for the <br />calculations, show the internal consistency in <br />our approach to the biogeochemical boundaries. <br />More detail on the development of the P and N <br />boundaries is given in (33), where we also em- <br />phasize that the proposed P and N boundaries <br />may be larger for an optimal allocation of N (and <br />P) over the globe. <br />Land - system change <br />The updated biosphere integrity boundary pro- <br />vides a considerable constraint on the amount <br />and pattern of land- system change in all ter- <br />restrial biomes: forests, woodlands, savannas, <br />grasslands, shrublands, tundra, and so on. The <br />land- system change boundary is now focused <br />more tightly on a specific constraint: the biogeo- <br />physical processes in land systems that directly <br />regulate climate— exchange of energy, water, and <br />momentum between the land surface and the <br />atmosphere. The control variable has been changed <br />from the amount of cropland to the amount of <br />forest cover remaining, as the three major forest <br />biomes — tropical, temperate and boreal —play a <br />stronger role in land surface- climate coupling <br />than other biomes (56, 57). In particular, we fo- <br />cus on those land - system changes that can in- <br />fluence the climate in regions beyond the region <br />where the land - system change occurred. <br />Of the forest biomes, tropical forests have sub- <br />stantial feedbacks to climate through changes in <br />evapotranspiration when they are converted to <br />nonforested systems, and changes in the distribu- <br />tion of boreal forests affect the albedo of the land <br />surface and hence regional energy exchange. Both <br />have strong regional and global teleconnections. <br />The biome -level boundary for these two types of <br />forest have been set at 85% (Table I and the <br />supplementary materials), and the boundary for <br />temperate forests has been proposed at 50% of <br />potential forest cover, because changes to tem- <br />perate forests are estimated to have weaker in- <br />fluences on the climate system at the global level <br />than changes to the other two major forest <br />biomes (56). These boundaries would almost <br />surely be met if the proposed biosphere integ- <br />rity boundary of 90% BII were respected. <br />Estimates of the current status of the land - <br />system change boundary are given in Figs. 2 and <br />3 and fig. S6 and in (58). <br />Freshwater use <br />The revised freshwater use boundary has retained <br />consumptive use of blue water [from rivers, lakes, <br />reservoirs, and renewable groundwater stores <br />(59)] as the global -level control variable and <br />4000 km3 /year as the value of the boundary. <br />This PB may be somewhat higher or lower de- <br />pending on rivers' ecological flow requirements <br />(6). Therefore, we report here a new assessment <br />to complement the PB with a basin -scale bound- <br />ary for the maximum rate of blue water with- <br />drawal along rivers, based on the amount of water <br />required in the river system to avoid regime shifts <br />in the functioning of flow - dependent ecosystems. <br />We base our control variable on the concept of <br />environmental water flows (EWF), which defines <br />the level of river flows for different hydrological <br />characteristics of river basins adequate to main- <br />tain a fair -to -good ecosystem state (60 -62). <br />The variable monthly flow (VMF) method <br />(33, 63) was used to calculate the basin -scale <br />boundary for water. This method takes account <br />of intra - annual variability by classifying flow re- <br />gimes into high -, intermediate -, and low -flow <br />months and allocating EWF as a percentage of <br />the mean monthly flow (MMF). Based on this <br />analysis, the zones of uncertainty for the river - <br />basin scale water boundary were set at 25 to 55% <br />of MMF for the low -flow regime, 40 to 70% for <br />the intermediate -flow regime, and 55 to 85% for <br />the high -flow regime (table S2). The boundaries <br />were set at the lower end of the uncertainty <br />ranges that encompass average monthly EWF. <br />Our new estimates of the current status of the <br />water use boundary— computed based on grid <br />cell- specific estimates of agricultural, industrial, <br />and domestic water withdrawals —are shown in <br />Figs. 2 and 3, with details in figs. S7 and S8. <br />Atmospheric aerosol loading <br />Aerosols have well- known, serious human health <br />effects, leading to about 7.2 million deaths per <br />year (64). They also affect the functioning of the <br />Earth system in many ways (65) (fig. S9). Here, <br />we focus on the effect of aerosols on regional <br />ocean - atmosphere circulation as the rationale <br />for a separate aerosols boundary. We adopt aero- <br />sol optical depth (AOD) (33) as the control var- <br />iable and use the south Asian monsoon as a case <br />study, based on the potential of widespread aero- <br />sol loading over the Indian subcontinent to switch <br />the monsoon system to a drier state. <br />RESEARCH ( RESEARCHARTICLE <br />The background AOD over south Asia is -0.15 <br />and can be as high as 0.4 during volcanic events <br />(66). Emissions of black carbon and organic car- <br />bon from cooking and heating with biofuels and <br />from diesel transportation, and emission of sul- <br />fates and nitrates from fossil fuel combustion, <br />can increase seasonal mean AODs to as high as <br />0.4 (larger during volcanic periods), leading to <br />decreases of 10 to 15% of incident solar radiation <br />at the surface (fig. S9). A substantial decrease in <br />monsoon activity is likely around an AOD of 0.50, <br />an increase of 0.35 above the background (67). <br />Taking a precautionary approach toward uncer- <br />tainties surrounding the position of the tipping <br />point, we propose a boundary at an AOD of 0.25 <br />(an increase due to human activities of 0.1), with <br />a zone of uncertainty of 0.25 to 0.50. The annual <br />mean AOD is currently about 0.3 (66), within the <br />zone of uncertainty. <br />Introduction of novel entities <br />We define novel entities as new substances, new <br />forms of existing substances, and modified life <br />forms that have the potential for unwanted geo- <br />physical and /or biological effects. Anthropogenic <br />introduction of novel entities to the environment <br />is of concern at the global level when these en- <br />tities exhibit (i) persistence, (ii) mobility across <br />scales with consequent widespread distributions, <br />and (iii) potential impacts on vital Earth- system <br />processes or subsystems. These potentially in- <br />clude chemicals and other new types of engi- <br />neered materials or organisms [e.g., (65 -71)] not <br />previously known to the Earth system, as well as <br />naturally occurring elements (for example, heavy <br />metals) mobilized by anthropogenic activities. <br />The risks associated with the introduction of <br />novel entities into the Earth system are exempli- <br />fied by the release of CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons), <br />which are very useful synthetic chemicals that <br />were thought to be harmless but had unexpected, <br />dramatic impacts on the stratospheric ozone layer. <br />In effect, humanity is repeatedly running such <br />global -scale experiments but not yet applying the <br />insights from previous experience to new appli- <br />cations (72, 73). <br />Today there are more than 100,000 substances <br />in global commerce (74). If nanomaterials and <br />plastic polymers that degrade to microplastics <br />are included, the list is even longer. There is also <br />a "chemical intensification" due to the rapidly <br />increasing global production of chemicals, the <br />expanding worldwide distribution as chemical <br />products or in consumer goods, and the exten- <br />sive global trade in chemical wastes (75). <br />In recent years, there has been a growing de- <br />bate about the global -scale effects of chemical <br />pollution, leading to calls for the definition of <br />criteria to identify the kinds of chemical sub- <br />stances that are likely to be globally problematic <br />(76, 77). Persson et al. (73) proposed that there are <br />three conditions that need to be fulfilled for a <br />chemical to pose a threat to the Earth system: (i) <br />the chemical has an unknown disruptive effect <br />on a vital Earth - system process; (ii) the disruptive <br />effect is not discovered until it is a problem at the <br />global scale; and (iii) the effect is not readily <br />SCIENCE sciencemag.org 13 FEBRUARY 2015 • VOL 347 ISSUE 6223 1259555 -7 <br />