Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-03-2006-5n
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 10-03-2006
>
Agenda - 10-03-2006-5n
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 2:28:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:51:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/3/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5n
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20061003
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
RES-2006-084 Resolution of the OCBOCC referring The Orchard subdivision back to the Planning Board
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachrnerit 2 <br />l~• ~ <br />ah~~~ ~t~u~T~ ~~~~vN~N~ ~ ~~s~~c~~~N~ ~~~~~Y~~N~ <br />Craig l~. Benedict, AICf~, director <br />~~.~d:i it Or <br />Administration ,~` ~.i~H . j: 30GF Revere Raad <br />(919} 2A~'y ~57'S u °~~'~' '~ P ~ Bax 8181 <br />(919} 6~4-3Un2 {~Ax} ti~j~~" ., Hilisborflugh, <br />www.co.orange.nc:us '°jd ~,t>.•~ North Carolina, 27278 <br />August 1 k3, 20C6 <br />fv1r. Bruce 8allentine <br />221 Providence Road <br />Chapel Hill, NC 27514 <br />Dear Mr. Ballentine: <br />Please see the enclosed l~:tt~:r firam the County AttomQy, Geoffrey Gledhill. l-le expressed <br />concerns about the original lots of retard (Tanaka 47.91 acres arrd Cheei<IAndreurs 37.2:1 acres fur <br />a total of 85.14 acres) not teeing part of the subdivisipn 'develu~ment'. The firs: eancept plan <br />sYakmitked to khe staff and Pia~ming hoard in January did include the entirety ofi both parcels but <br />tells condition was later amendod in February to exclude the r~vo 'developed" pa:-cels whore hGUSes <br />exist. <br />l concur faith the akturney tttafithis modificalian in February ant the ensuing results of changes in <br />total `deveCapment' area and related upt;3n space requirements ~m~y rot meet the ir3tent of the <br />zoning and subdivision_code: You may :rery well have tFie ability to deuelup tine Combined parcels <br />in,a design very similar to the present one but in a mare i~-~clusive manner.. <br />Please let me kno?~v if you vrould like to meet on this issue prior to the Board of County <br />Commissioners (BOCK? muting on Auclusi ~2, 20t~8, have this discussr;d at the. meeting or <br />rectuest delay of the itart~ franc the agenda ulntil both tic attorney and I carri meet .~vitt3 you to <br />discuss issues noted herein. As it stands no~v, his letter ofi August 17, 2808. to the 13ClCC, County <br />tlrlanager and me removes leis p©sitive recommendation. l have faL~nd it extremely important to <br />gave the concurrence of the'i~lanaq~r, Attorney arld !before applications are heard by the 8(JCC. <br />Please le# me know aF your thoughts on this matter. <br />Sinter ly, ~. <br />'mil ~i.^'~r~,~+ <br />Craig t~. B~nadict, AiCP, Planning & lnspt~ctions Director <br />Chia/dg <br />xc: t3oard of County Commissioners <br />.lohn P~. Link, Dlr., County ~lariager <br />Geoffrey Gledhill, County Attorney <br />Robert Davis, Current Planning uupervisor <br />.~ <br />G:Lldministra'i~v¢ DivtiCi~JtrtCorrospande~ce'st3ailentinc-Tt~~Orchard.dac <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.