Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-19-2006-7c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 09-19-2006
>
Agenda - 09-19-2006-7c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 4:27:39 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:49:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/19/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060919
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Chair Carey asked how much grant money have they received and Eric Griffin <br />said that they have received approximately $4 million so far. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he does not support buying the magnets for the <br />reference cards. He would rather save $12,000, <br />John Link said that they would pursue option one for the reference card <br />distribution, <br />Jack Ball said that they would be seeking other avenues such as trying to get <br />some Orange County businesses to help sponsor these cards. <br />2. Solid Waste Matters <br />Rod Visser said that an initiative came up in August and they were approached <br />by Alamance County officials to look, conceptually, if Orange County would have any <br />interest with Alamance County receiving Orange County's waste. The second item is <br />the Highway 57 solid waste convenience center and that the lease will expire on April 1, <br />2006, They are exploring options for this. They are certainly working hard on a fallback <br />option, Thirdly, the staff will give an update on the SWAB and the three-year update to <br />the ten-year solid waste management plan that is due to the State in June 2006. <br />Solid Waster Director Gayle Wilson said that there was a meeting in August in <br />Graham, with Alamance County officials and Chair Carey, John Link, and himself <br />attending. The purpose of the meeting was that they were asked by Alamance County if <br />Orange County would be interested in delivering its waste to Alamance County if <br />Alamance County would be willing to receive it There was no promise from Alamance <br />County to take the waste if Orange County said yes, but only an inquiry if Orange <br />County would be interested. An analysis was performed and the Engineering Consultant <br />looked at it also. The memorandum attached to the report provides an overview of the <br />options. The prerequisites to transferring waste out of County are: <br />development of a transfer station <br />procurement of the out of county disposal site <br />procurement of hauling services (contract or in-house) <br />The consultant concluded that Orange County should proceed with the original <br />plan to develop a transfer station when the landfill reaches capacity because of the <br />modest landfill space savings to be achieved, coupled with the additional expense and <br />effort. The staff analysis looked at four options: <br />Transferring waste to Alamance as soon as possible, prior to our landfill reaching <br />capacity <br />Transferring waste to Alamance in 2010, when the landfill reaches capacity and after <br />they have developed their permanent transfer station <br />Follow original 2010 timeline of developing a transfer station and considering <br />Alamance as a destination along with other available options <br />Negotiating for an equity arrangement between Orange County and Alamance <br />County, if Alamance County disposal rates are not competitive with other options, <br />This option could be pursued independent or in conjunction with other options. <br />Gayle Wilson said that the key issue seems to he cost related. He said that <br />transferring waste to Alamance County (or any other location) would entail considerable <br />additional cost to the local solid waste system. He said that this was swell-discussed <br />consequence of the decision of not pursuing a new landfill in Orange County back in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.