Orange County NC Website
Approved 12/19/12 <br />AGENDA ITEM VII: BOARD COMMENTS <br />Paul Guthrie: I would like to talk about how this committee could operate and what we should seek to do in the topic of <br />transportation. Are we planning for the County we were or the County we are likely to be? The dialogue I hear is <br />about the County we are and not looking ahead. The reality is that we don't have a transportation system today that <br />can handle it. You can either leave it alone for 5 -20 years or say what we are going to do or take small, smart steps <br />now. I would like to begin to think about how we should begin to address these types of issues. <br />Sam Lasris: You mean beyond the long term transportation plan we deal with? <br />Paul Guthrie: There is nothing wrong with those but they are a bureaucratic nightmare. In addition, we should think <br />about these things too. I ran a national advisory committee and the first thing I learned was the bosses don't have a <br />clue about how to use an advisory committee well so you have to push the bosses to have a meaningful impact. <br />Annette Jurgelski: We would want to push for the ' /z cent sales tax (i.e. letters to the Editor). We should be coming up <br />with suggestions for our own area. I see needs for the seniors in my community. <br />Jeff Charles: I am concerned about what the special needs for seniors for the last two to four years of driving (better <br />lighting at night). <br />Darcy Zorio: Aging in place. Seniors being able to live in their own house. <br />Paul Guthrie: But there is no transportation system once a day. There are people that are walking there, four or five <br />miles per day. <br />Jeff Charles: I have talked about the advent of new personal vehicle technology (i.e. scooters). Cars don't have room <br />to pass them. How do you integrate those vehicles with those who have posted speed limits of 35 to 45 miles per <br />hour? <br />Paul Guthrie: As far as future development in Orange County, where would you place schools, business or senior <br />centers or other facilities that serve a larger population? I don't think the CTP will do that. There are two key <br />ingredients that I don't see. One is the availability of water and sewer. <br />Randy Marshall: My guess is the rural buffer is going to collapse from all kinds of pressure. The rural buffer is the <br />reason the water and sewer has extended into the county but we don't want to talk about it and it's not on the agenda <br />doesn't mean it won't happen. You need to look at future trends and what we need to plan for to manage the <br />transition. <br />Amy Cole: Looking at the land development and the Orange County. I look to outside sources (i.e. documentary on <br />Portland Oregon). I think about when I retire, I will have to move because if the transportation isn't fixed, I will not be <br />able to go to the places I am going now. I think everyone should take advantage of public transportation. <br />Sam Lasris: I agree with Amy in that we have to look at transportation linked land use planning and 2030 <br />Comprehensive Plan is a guide but it doesn't get us to where we want to be. <br />