Browse
Search
OUTBoard minutes 082113
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
OUTBoard minutes 082113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 1:47:11 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 4:37:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/21/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OUTBoard agenda 082113
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange Unified Transportation Board\Agendas\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 9/18/13 <br />Bret Martin: The money that is being divided up throughout the state for divisions is 30% of the state's transportation <br />money and will go to capital projects. There is a statewide scoring methodology that applies to all projects but all the <br />division projects will be ranked at the division level and then the MPO /RPO level. <br />Alex Castro: We are in division 7, Orange County, less the MPO, Durham is in Division 5 so you have cross - <br />jurisdictional conflicts, how do you resolve that when the Chapel Hill Durham MPO is partially in Division 7 and <br />partially in Division 5. Do they have to be coordinated by both divisions? <br />Bret Martin: Yes, they will. <br />Paul Guthrie: Why don't you go through the description because there are other questions? <br />Bret Martin: (Continued presentation). <br />Paul Guthrie: If you look at our previous materials from the Triangle Transit, you notice there is a commuter rail link <br />that starts in Raleigh and stops in Durham County which is part of a longer plan. One of the motivations is because <br />that is the line where the district ends. I think that is a manifestation of what we will see as we go along with the plan <br />and we need strategy as to how we deal with that. <br />Bret Martin: Some of the criticism regarding the equity formula will pop up with this. (Continued presentation). <br />Jeff Charles: In this formula, decisions are made at the district level for some things and on a regional level for other <br />things. At the district level, we are competing with Greensboro and Burlington /Graham . At the regional level, we are <br />competing with Winston Salem and a whole list of towns down to Charlotte. Most of our contacts are now to the east, <br />we are at a disadvantage in being able to fully incorporate ourselves in the Research Triangle under this formula. <br />Bret Martin: That is a fair statement. <br />Paul Guthrie: When were these divisions set up? <br />Bret Martin: Many decades ago to coordinate with prison labor to deal with road maintenance. (Continued <br />presentation). <br />Jeff Charles: Do bicycle facilities fall under this? <br />Bret Martin: Yes. <br />Jeff Charles: The division needs the SR routes which are the regional ones where we want the bike lanes for the <br />most part. <br />Bret Martin: I will get to that in a moment. There are specific changes that apply to that. <br />Paul Guthrie: 25% of the 50% is local input and the other 25% is DOT Engineer input. The 50% is really 25 %. <br />Bret Martin: 25% is the division rank and 25% is the local input. The division rank means, how did the project score <br />according to the same criteria within the division as opposed to against. (Continued presentation). <br />Jeff Charles: If DOT is going to have 100% statewide; 50% plus the division DOT Engineer's 25 %, that is 75% <br />regional control and then in the sub regional they get 50% plus another 25 %. It seems the MPO /RPO rank is 0 at the <br />statewide region and 25% at the sub - regional. <br />Ted Triebel: Minimal influence. <br />Bret Martin: This is what we worked off of before. At the division level, the MPO /RPO rank has always been a hefty <br />40% which is profound. For quantitative data, this is the scoring criteria. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.