Browse
Search
OUTBoard minutes 041713
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
OUTBoard minutes 041713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 1:46:26 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 4:34:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/17/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OUTBoard agenda 041713
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange Unified Transportation Board\Agendas\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 6/19/13 <br />Therefore, the Plan has been pre- reviewed by OUTBoard Vice - Chair, Jeff Charles, and by <br />planning staff member Abigaile Pittman. Related documents, including Draft Plan <br />Summary, Full Draft Plan, on -line comment form, and community engagement forum <br />(survey): http: / /www.ncdot.gov /bikeped /planning /walkbikenc/ <br />OUTBoard Action: To receive review comments suggested by Jeff Charles and Abigaile <br />Pittman, and consider recommended comments to be provided to NCDOT <br />Abigaile Pittman reviewed the WalkBike NC Plan noting that WalkBike NC is North Carolina's first statewide master <br />plan to define a vision, goals and strategies for improving walking and bicycling for residents and visitors. She <br />shared the comments from staff and Jeff Charles. <br />Jeff Charles noted that there was a lot of work put into this plan and he thinks the OUTBoard needs to give NCDOT <br />staff kudos for doing a pretty good job. He added that he thinks it's important to tell them the positives and say `oh by <br />the way' there are other things. Jeff elaborated that they took very unique approach, a good one, in that they looked <br />at economic factors, how it would improve tourism if we became a destination state for bicycling. They talked about <br />health issues, the obesity rates of young children, we rank fifth or sixth in the nation in obesity in children. They also <br />talk about economic benefits of health, safety, savings, environmental issues, increasing the use of these things. He <br />would like to come up with a general statement applauding their efforts in highlighting the need for bicycle and <br />pedestrian for all of these good reasons with the OUTBoard and staffs comments on how it can be improved. <br />Abigaile Pittman advised that in her research online, that most other states have a safe routes for seniors programs. <br />Jeff Charles noted that in the plan there is a benchmark reporting by the alliance for biking and walking from 2012. <br />Safest states to bicycle, the safest state in the US is South Dakota, North Carolina is 4411, safest state for walking is <br />Vermont and North Carolina is 415'. We are so far behind and we have to recognize they are taking an enormous <br />step forward with this new approach. <br />Paul Guthrie added that he thinks the plan is deficient in one way, it doesn't sufficiently indicate that for any of this to <br />have any major long -term significance it has to integrated with the broader picture of transportation. That is <br />especially true for this county where walking and biking will be the feeders to future transportation systems. We are <br />beginning to look at the infancy of transportation systems across the entire county. One thing we can do now is to <br />begin building a funding system for bus and rail transportation. Paul references the statistic of 6.7% of residents <br />without automobiles in the report and suggested that in rural areas of the county that rate is probably higher as high <br />as 13 %. <br />Paul Guthrie suggested that the report should show examples. <br />Jeff Charles elaborated that this is an enormous step. He noted that this is becoming a big issue in respect to <br />bicycling infrastructure because we are looking for new modes of transportation in Orange County and we are seeing <br />these scooters that can only go 30 mph in 55 mph zones and they are going to flow into the 4 foot bike lanes as <br />bailout to allow vehicles to pass them. He noted that while Segways are not going to catch on but new technology, <br />organic transit, they are 36 to 42 inches wide, so when you talk about a 4 or 5 foot lane that is a problem. He added <br />that they are also designing a truck that could carry 850 lb. loads so you could envision that being used for pizza <br />delivery or grocery delivery and meals on wheels. Jeff noted that the report cites a shift in demographics to 65 from <br />13% today to about 20% and we need to broaden the thought process for the upright bicycles, scooters and other <br />competing technology in these four foot bike lanes we are arguing for. <br />Abigaile Pittman added that in some communities residents tool around in golf carts. <br />Alex Castro agreed with Jeffs comments and staffs comments. Alex Castro moved to approve the submitted <br />comments and the additional comments discussed at the meeting. Ted Triebel seconded the motion. <br />Ted Triebel added that his thoughts run parallel with Alex's and he was happy to see the work staff and Jeff did and <br />commended both. He particularly agrees with comment number 6 as going to the critical core to keep in mind going <br />forward. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.