Browse
Search
OUTBoard minutes 092117
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
OUTBoard minutes 092117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 10:33:31 AM
Creation date
2/23/2018 4:06:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/21/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OUTBoard agenda 092017
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange Unified Transportation Board\Agendas\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 11/15/17 <br />104 Andy Henry responded that the MPO does include a small portion of Chatham County in its planning area. He added <br />105 that MPO models the whole Triangle region in two ways: the travel demand model and the land use model, inclusive <br />106 of 10 counties. The model extends to Siler City in Chatham County. <br />107 <br />108 David Laudicina commented that Chatham County is planning to develop its whole northeastern quadrant with <br />109 60,000 new residents. <br />110 <br />111 Andy Henry agreed that Chatham County's population is growing the fastest, especially around Pittsboro with a new <br />112 development called Chatham Park, and the existing Briar Chapel community. Chatham County has an agreement <br />113 with Cary about how far they can come into the County with planning. There are a lot of apartments and senior <br />114 housing in that area. <br />115 <br />116 Art Menius commented on the 2013 population just for the portion in Chatham; it is about twice the entire population <br />117 for Chatham in the 1980 census. <br />118 <br />119 Andy Henry agreed that Chatham County is forecasted to grow pretty quickly. He continued his presentation. The <br />120 performance measures in the alternative analysis show different data on measures such as the average minutes of <br />121 delay per person and mode share in a "no build" scenario. Travel isochrones show how far someone can travel in the <br />122 afternoon peak within 10 -20 -30 minutes (see contours on the maps in presentation) in centers heavy in commuting <br />123 traffic around the Triangle (especially in downtown Durham, Chapel Hill, Hillsborough, etc.). The idea is to show how <br />124 easy it is to commute. Travel time is also measured on roadway corridors like 1 -85 to look at travel time in a "no build" <br />125 scenario and the effects of building alternatives. Mr. Henry pointed out that even with improvements, travel time will <br />126 not recover. According to the model, if travel time is 20 minutes with the "no build" scenario, it may go down to 16 <br />127 minutes even with costly improvements, but not much lower than that. The congestion map shows volume (V = <br />128 number of vehicles on the road) divided by capacity (C = how many vehicles road can handle). Map is color -coded <br />129 per percentage. The level of service at a 1 (100 %) is a level of service "E," on an A -F range where "F" (120 %) is <br />130 traffic almost standing -still and "A" is free - flowing. Therefore, a level "E" is pretty congested. The main highway <br />131 corridors are very congested as well as areas within Chapel Hill and around it, especially around Estes Drive. <br />132 <br />133 Heidi Perry asked if these maps are based off of single occupancy vehicles for each person, so when you think of <br />134 population growth, even with a "no build" scenario, you are talking about having more single occupancy vehicles. <br />135 <br />136 Andy Henry said that he was glad Ms. Perry brought -up the "no build" scenario. The presentation is based on no <br />137 build, no further improvements with the 2045 population and employment on the model. However, it is not all single <br />138 occupancy vehicles; 10 —15% would not be single occupancy vehicles. <br />139 <br />140 Heidi Perry asked if the current mode share is built -out too. <br />141 <br />142 Andy Henry said that this is a difficult question to answer but the model does not take the current mode share. The <br />143 model has some behavior worked into it; it will change the mode share between single occupancy and multi - <br />144 occupancy. However, it does not change much; the model is not that sensitive. <br />145 <br />146 Alex Castro asked who determines the perimeters of the model. <br />147 <br />148 Andy Henry said that there is a team that works on the model. The Triangle Regional Model has 4 partners: our <br />149 MPO, the Capital Area MPO, NCDOT, and Go Triangle. The partners provide financial investment and there is a <br />150 model team at NC State in the Institute for Transportation Research and Education. <br />151 <br />152 Alex Castro asked for clarification as to if there was a standard model used statewide. <br />153 <br />154 Andy Henry replied that there is not a standard model. <br />155 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.