Browse
Search
OUTBoard minutes 092117
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
OUTBoard minutes 092117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 10:33:31 AM
Creation date
2/23/2018 4:06:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/21/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OUTBoard agenda 092017
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange Unified Transportation Board\Agendas\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 11/15/17 <br />53 costs must be covered by expected revenues, so there are a more limited number of projects than in the CTP. The <br />54 hatched area on the map shows where the MTP was used to choose STPP projects. STPP or Strategic <br />55 Transportation Prioritization Process is a gateway into NCDOT methodology for funding projects in the transportation <br />56 approval program. Funding plans are stretched out over 10 years, in these cases. The MTP lists highway transit and <br />57 bicycle and pedestrian projects to address deficiencies through the year 2045. The plan is based on future land use, <br />58 population, employment and the travel demand model (to be discussed later in the presentation), and a financial <br />59 plan. Projects must be in the MTP to get federal funding to then move into the TIP. Planners used to use the MTP to <br />60 reserve right -of -way for future roadways. Mr. Henry reviewed the process of creating the MTP, breaking down <br />61 various analyses, projections, and the creating of key alternatives for addressing congestion. The MPO will release <br />62 its draft, referred to as its "preferred option," in October. This draft will go back out for public input, at which time the <br />63 OUTBoard can also make additional comments. The plan and report will likely be approved by December 2017 or <br />64 January 2018. Another part of the process is running the alternatives analysis in consideration of land use and <br />65 transportation networks. The alternatives are put through the Triangle Regional Model to see how well the <br />66 alternatives meet future demand. The alternatives are not presented singularly; projects will be taken out from the <br />67 various alternatives for the final plan. Mr. Henry went over the process of creating alternatives in more depth. He said <br />68 that they take 2 land use scenarios; one is the community plan, based on local comprehensive land use plans, and <br />69 the other is the "aim high" plan where higher density scenarios are examined in the urbanized areas, like around <br />70 proposed light rail stations. These plans are combined with a transportation network with lots of highway projects, <br />71 along with one with fewer highway projects and more transit, and then a network that balances highway and transit. <br />72 These combinations inform the alternatives. For land use, guide totals for population and employment are put into the <br />73 land use model and then the model distributes the population - employment around the counties to see where they <br />74 think it will go. Looking at Orange County, the population is currently about 139,000 people. In 2045 it is estimated to <br />75 be 194,000, a 40 percent increase. Employment -wise, there are currently about 64,000 jobs in Orange County. In <br />76 2045, there will be 107,000 jobs, a 68 percent increase. Employment is increasing faster than population in Orange <br />77 County, a pattern in all the other counties in the MPO as well. <br />78 <br />79 Erle Smith asked how Mr. Henry figured a 28% disparity between population growth and employment growth? This <br />80 suggests a pretty high unemployment rate. <br />81 <br />82 Andy Henry answered that this figure is based on the growth rate. The County will continue to attract workers from <br />83 collar counties or surrounding counties. <br />84 <br />85 Erle Smith said that Orange County was like a salary seat. <br />86 <br />87 Andy Henry commented that it is evident in the mornings on NC -54 and 15 -501 with traffic being very high that a lot <br />88 of people are coming in to work at UNC and other places. <br />89 <br />90 David Laudicina asked if the employment forecast takes into consideration what the Research Triangle is trying to do, <br />91 which is to add 110,000 new jobs, generating a huge amount of service jobs. <br />92 <br />93 Andy Henry answered that the population total is from the NC demographer and is broken -out by county (20 year <br />94 projection). The MPO stretches that total out to 30 years to get its figures. The employment figures were from Woods <br />95 and Poole, a private company dealing with economic and demographic projections out to 2050. <br />96 <br />97 David Laudicina said that those population projections could be conservative. <br />98 <br />99 Andy Henry responded that upon revisiting some of the projection forecasts, sometimes the projections seem either <br />100 lower or higher, depending on what people expect. <br />101 <br />102 Alex Castro asked why parts of Chatham County are included even though Chatham County is outside of the MPO. <br />103 <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.