Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-12-2006-9d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 09-12-2006
>
Agenda - 09-12-2006-9d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 5:07:38 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:46:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/12/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060912
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~J~ ;~ 6 <br />3. Can the access to the stream corridor be located between Lots 14 and 15 rather <br />than Lots 7 and 8 (as suggested by staff)? <br />Applicant's Response: As recommended by the Planning Board, we have created an <br />open space corridor between what is now designated as Lots 15 and 16 (formerly Lots <br />14 and 15). We have also adjusted lot lines in this area in order to provide more <br />favorable topography for a pedestrian path through this "pedestrian open space area" <br />(POSA) that varies from 140 feet to over 500 feet in width as it connects to the Phil's <br />Creek stream corridor. <br />4. How will access be provided to the proposed community well system? <br />Applicant's Response: We have actually revised the developer's program for <br />Westhampton to utilize the more conventional approach of individual wells on each <br />individual lot.. After doing additional reseazch, we concluded that this was a better, <br />more envirorunentally sensitive approach (dispersing wells throughout the site rather <br />than focusing on a single, concentrated location) and was also the method of <br />providing potable water that the rnazket actually seems to prefer, Therefore, the <br />question about access to the community well location is now moot. <br />5. Get clarification from NCIDOT regarding size of cul-de-sacs and width of right- <br />of-way. Also, would like for developer to meet on-site with NCDOT to discuss <br />the reaction times associated with the proposed entrance road and Hatch Road. <br />Applicant's Response: We mek on site with the NCDOT District Engineer (Chuck <br />Edwards) and the Assistant District Engineer (1Vanette Fogleman) to discuss the <br />classification of Westhampton Way and the location of the site entrance on Hatch <br />Road. Based on this meeting, it was agreed that Westhampton Way should not be <br />designed as a collector street, and alternatively should be designed as a 27-foot back- <br />of-curb to back-of-curb street, located in a 50-foot wide right-of-way. Therefore, we <br />have (1) adjusted the proposed street geometry for the internal streets of <br />Westhampton in accordance with NCDOT's guidance {27-foot back-of--curb to back- <br />of-curb streets, 50-foot right-of--way, 5-foot utility easements on both sides of the 50- <br />foot right-of--way, and 75-foot diameter cul-de-sacs located within a 100-foot <br />diameter right-of-way). <br />In addition, NCDOT reviewed the proposed location for the site entrance <br />(Westhampton Way) off of Hatch Road, and agreed that the proposed location was <br />acceptable and provided adequate sight distances to both the east and west. We have <br />subsequently further enhanced the available sight distance to the west by adjusting the <br />entrance location eastward approximately 50 feet. <br />li~estharnptmi -Response !o Slajf Connnenls <br />A4arch 22, 2006 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.