Orange County NC Website
<br /> <br /> 2 <br />Zander presented her board’s plans for a “Green Restaurant Challenge” for CFE <br />consideration and potential collaboration. She said restaurants would be evaluated <br />based on four criteria: energy consumption, water consumption, waste reduction, and <br />local sourcing. Zander said she has conferred with Brennan Bouma because of his <br />experience with the Triangle Green Business Challenge while with Triangle J Council of <br />Governments. She has also conferred with Blair Pollock and Muriel Williman with the <br />Orange County Solid Waste Management department. <br /> <br />Zander asked whether the CFE would be interested in collaborating with her board, and <br />possibly expanding the “challenge” to restaurants operating throughout Orange County. <br />She noted that one of the CFE’s objectives is to increase food composting. <br /> <br />CFE members asked questions and offered their ideas: <br /> <br /> Hintz asked if there would be prizes awarded. Zander said the winners would be <br />recognized with good public relations. She noted Person County had a <br />guidebook to restaurants and highlighted those with sustainable practices. <br /> <br /> Wegman asked if the idea has been discussed with sample restaurants. Zander <br />has spoken with two owners who noted monitoring waste would be difficult. <br /> <br /> Hintz asked staff if there would be any problem for the County to participate, <br />such as listing winning restaurants on its website. Shaw said it should be alright <br />to list the winners based on the contest criteria, but he would need to check. <br /> <br /> Sassaman asked how much variation might there be among different <br />restaurants; and noted a restaurant’s size would affect its ability to achieve <br />efficiencies. Zander said they need to find equitable ways to measure success, <br />such as basing on number of patrons, percentage change, or most improved. <br /> <br /> Neal said evaluating energy consumption would also be challenging due to some <br />restaurants using leased space versus owning the building outright and being <br />able to make changes. Gronback suggested dividing them into two categories. <br /> <br /> O’Connor suggested promoting financial incentives, such as rebates. <br /> <br /> Hintz noted a countywide campaign would also include Mebane, Hillsborough, <br />and Carrboro. He asked how the challenge would work. Zander said she <br />envisions a six-week contest, beginning with publicity, baseline measures at the <br />participating restaurants, documenting any changes, and tallying results. <br /> <br /> Cada said the variability of restaurant buildings makes it difficult to make <br />comparisons. It may be better to recognize restaurants for the percent of <br />improvements made for different measures over the time period. <br /> <br /> Neal said this contest should be a positive and educational opportunity that <br />encourages participation. He suggested that “just by playing, you win.” <br /> <br /> Shaw said rather than using detailed metrics perhaps the contest could ask <br />participants to simply tell what they have done to reduce waste, or reduce energy <br />or water consumption, or to increase local sourcing. Keep it open and subjective. <br /> <br /> O’Connor suggested introducing some social justice element, such as the <br />percentage of unused food that is donated to another organization. <br /> <br />Zander thanked CFE members for these ideas and asked if anyone wished to help plan <br />for the contest in a smaller group discussion. Wegman, Neal, and Gronback offered <br />their assistance. Sassaman thanked those members and asked Neal to report back.