CFE minutes 110915 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

2 V. Falls Lake Rules – Davis reported on the Upper Neuse River Basin Association’s (UNRBA) ongoing efforts to improve the Falls Lake Nutrient Management Strategy (Falls Lake Rules). He showed a preview of a presentation he planned to make to the BOCC at an upcoming work session. Davis said stage two of the Falls Lake Rules require local governments, the NCDOT, the agricultural community, and other regulated parties located in the Falls Lake watershed to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient loading to Falls Lake by 40% and 77%, respectively. He said the UNRBA is working on several projects to address serious technical and financial impediments to meeting these nutrient reduction goals. Davis provided an overview of the following projects by the UNRBA: 1. Lake and Watershed Water Quality Monitoring 2. BMP Nutrient Credit Development 3. Development of Nutrient Credit Calculation Tool 4. Falls Lake Rules Review CFE members asked several questions about the projects and the overall objectives of improving the water quality in Falls Lake, which provides drinking water for Raleigh.  Hintz asked why the nutrient reduction goals were chosen if they are unattainable. Davis said Division of Water Resources staff was rushed to come up with goals, but data was lacking and model assumptions were inappropriate.  Becker asked if the UNRBA would use a difference model than the one used by the State. Davis said they will use same model, but with more and better data.  Sassaman asked whether there had been stream sampling performed in advance of enacting the current rules. Davis said DWR relied on whatever data existed previously and on sampling from five gages in western end of Falls Lake.  Shaw asked if DWR is receptive to getting these data from UNRBA. Davis said they are because they know their initial model was flawed.  Hintz asked if the CFE inform landowners of the importance of minimizing their use of fertilizers is that helpful to Falls Lake? Davis said it would be helpful to the lake, but local governments would not likely receive credits.  Davis noted atmospheric deposition is a significant source of nutrients that was not factored into the model or the rules. He said up to 50 percent of the nitrogen entering Chesapeake Bay is from the atmosphere. Sassaman thanked Davis for sharing this information. There no action required. VI. Annual Report and Work Plan (2015-16) – Sassaman reminded CFE members that each year the BOCC asks its advisory boards to prepare a report of their activities, accomplishments, new issues, and concerns. He asked Shaw to present the draft report and work plan for 2015-16. Shaw reviewed the draft report, highlighting the changes from the previous report. He identified several additions to the important accomplishments section and the activities the CFE expects to carry out in 2016. Shaw asked for comments from the members.  O’Connor suggested adding the CFE’s recommendation of developing incentives for energy-efficient construction to the list of accomplishments.  Hintz suggested adding language to link the news articles to the SOE report