Browse
Search
CFE minutes 101016
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
CFE minutes 101016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 12:07:31 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 12:02:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/10/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> 3 <br />Mallett and McCook showed illustrations that demonstrated how the Flexible <br />Development would help to cluster home sites, thus allowing for more common open <br />space, less infrastructure, and lower costs of construction. They presented a table that <br />showed that as lot sizes decrease, the required amount of open space increases within <br />the subdivision. For instance, 30 percent open space is required for a subdivision with <br />40,000-square-foot lots; 40 percent open space is required for 30,000-sq.-ft. lots; 50 <br />percent open space is required for 20,000-sq.-ft. lots. Off-site septic would be allowed, <br />but each lot would have its own dedicated off-lot septic area. <br /> <br />Hintz made suggestions on the need to clarify language in Section 7 and Section 3. <br /> <br />Bouma asked what may occur in the common open space. Mallet said there could be <br />recreational amenities, such as trails, playground, garden, gazebo, and picnic shelter— <br />as long as it is approved and maintained by the homeowners association. Bouma asked <br />if the common area could be used for a community solar energy array or community <br />garden. Mallett said it could as long as it stayed out of sensitive resource areas. Each <br />project is considered on a case-by-case basis. <br /> <br />Gronback thanked Mallett and McCook and asked if the Planning Department wanted <br />comments from the CFE. Shaw will prepare a draft letter of support of the proposed <br />amendments to the UDO for CFE consideration at the November meeting. <br /> <br />VI. Potential SolSmart Community Designation – Bouma briefed the CFE on the <br />County’s application for designation as a SolSmart community [http://www.gosparc.org/]. <br />He said a new Pew Research Center survey shows nearly nine-in-ten adults in the U.S. <br />favor expanding the use of solar power to meet our energy needs. Through the SolSmart <br />program from the US Department of Energy, the County hopes to access technical <br />assistance that will help us make Orange County an even better place for solar energy <br />generation. The program aims to reduce the uncertainties, delays, and unidentified <br />barriers that contribute to higher solar installation costs. Bouma said the County hopes <br />to access a higher level of technical support through working with a SolSmart Advisor. <br />This Advisor would split their time with Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and the County for up to <br />six months, starting in 2017. <br /> <br />VII. CFE Annual Report and Work Plan 2016-17 – Shaw reminded CFE members that <br />each year the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) asks its advisory boards to <br />prepare a report of their activities, accomplishments, new issues, and concerns. Shaw <br />referenced the copy of the 2015-16 report, and noted that the back side of each CFE <br />agenda contains key information from the report. Shaw said a draft 2016-17 report will <br />be provided for CFE consideration at next meeting. The final report is due December 16. <br /> <br />VIII. Updates and Information Items – Information on the following subjects was provided in <br />the meeting materials: a) Orange County study to justify stream buffers, b) Oakwood <br />solar farm approved near Mebane, c) Duke Forest deer management, d) OWASA <br />approves conditions for Mtns-to-Sea Trail (MST), e) new MST bridge over the Eno River <br />in Hillsborough, f) Triangle ozone deaths can be prevented, g) Carolina water managers <br />brace for future, i) North Carolina’s invasive plants, j) windfarm planned off the NC coast, <br />k) Americans polarized view of climate change, and l) Dutch adapting to sea-level rise. <br /> <br />IV. Adjournment – Gronback adjourned the meeting at 9:30 pm. <br /> <br /> <br />Summary by Rich Shaw, DEAPR Staff
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.