Orange County NC Website
<br /> <br /> 2 <br />others also allow public comments to show up on the page. Hunt and Northrup warned <br />that if the CFE allows public participation it must refrain from censuring comments that <br />don’t necessarily reflect the positions of the CFE. <br /> <br />Hintz recommended that the CFE only “push” material to its Facebook page, at least for <br />the short term. Other CFE members agreed with that suggestion. <br /> <br />Gronback summarized the discussion thus far, noting that the CFE will provide the login <br />information for its current Facebook account to allow the transition to a new County- <br />supported account. She said it appears the CFE wishes to allow only posts by CFE <br />members with no public comments. <br /> <br />Hunt and Northrup described the following process for making the transition: <br />• CFE will provide login credential to the current Facebook account (created with a <br />previous member’s personal email) to Beth Young, DEAPR Communications. <br />• Beth will work with the County’s IT Help Desk to transition the account to meet <br />Orange County requirements in its Social Media Policy. <br />• Beth will provide the two or three CFE designees with the login name (email) and <br />password for updating Facebook. <br />• CFE members will post and maintain the CFE Facebook account. <br />• Each time a CFE member who has update authority leaves the Commission, the <br />password will be changed. <br />• The current password will be logged and maintained by the IT Help Desk. <br /> <br />Gronback thanked Hunt and Northrup and said the CFE will follow-up on the transition <br />and will develop a process and protocols for posting information on Facebook. <br /> <br />IV. UDO Text Amendment for Minor Subdivisions – Patrick Mallett and Rachel McCook <br />(Orange County Planning staff) presented a package of proposed amendments to the <br />Unified Development Ordinance for minor subdivisions in Orange County. The proposed <br />changes would a) increase the maximum number of lots eligible for minor “flexible” <br />subdivisions from five lots to 12 lots, and b) allow for smaller lots and larger areas of <br />common open space within those subdivisions, but with no net increase in density. <br /> <br />Mallett presented slides to explain the changes and how they will unfold. He said this is <br />the first in a series of amendments to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) to offer <br />greater flexibility and more sustainable development. This particular set of changes is <br />considered non-controversial because it provides a “win-win” for all parties. Mallett said <br />his coming to the CFE is part of the community outreach effort to explain the proposed <br />amendments and to receive feedback. The Planning Board will discuss on October 17. <br /> <br />Mallett said the proposed amendments will promote flexible design and the preservation <br />of open space in Orange County—both of which further some of the housing and land <br />use goals of the Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The amendments would <br />consolidate the major and minor subdivision standards for the Flexible Development <br />option available to landowners and developers. The changes also combine the former <br />Cluster Development provisions with the Flexible Development option. Mallett noted that <br />this option is not available for within the Rural Buffer around Chapel Hill and Carrboro. <br /> <br />Mallett discussed the many benefits of clustering residences using the Flexible <br />Development option, including increased open space, reduced infrastructure costs, <br />better stormwater management, higher home values, and benefits to wildlife. <br />