Orange County NC Website
Old Business <br />(A) Meeting with Agricultural Preservation Board Regarding Nuisance Animal Noise Report <br /> At meeting on September 24, 2012, Bob Marotto, ASAB Chair Kris Bergstrand and ASAB <br />subcommittee members, Judy Miller, Suzanne Roy, and Michael Stewart presented report and <br />conclusion of the subcommittee not to recommend any change to the ordinance concerning <br />nuisance animal noise. Ag. Preservation Board Officers and DEAPR staff discussed the possibility <br />of talking with the County’s new Public Affairs Director about roviding information to potential <br />home buyersegarding the prevalence of agricultural land use in the county. Attendees also <br />discussed potential cooperation in the event of emergencies involving large farm animals. <br /> Susan Elmore acknowledged that complaints related to agricultural use may increase as the <br />rural part of the county becomes more populated. Kate Doom-Patel suggested the possibility of <br />distributing information to realtors in the county regarding prevalent agricultural land use. <br />(B) Animal Identification Follow-Up Items <br /> ASAB reviewed Margaret Heath’s communication to BOCC regarding animal identification and <br />BOCC Chair B. Pelissier’s response to Margaret Heath. <br /> Friends of Orange County Animal Services (FOCAS) offered to provide $100 worth of fillable tags. <br />Bob Marotto suggested that it is feasible to sell the tags for a fee to fund acquisition of <br />additional tags, which would need to go through a budget request. He indicated that this option <br />is preferable to mechanical engravers, which are cost-prohibitive, or additional data entry by <br />staff. Board members agreed by general consensus that the Department should take this <br />approach. <br />(C) Cat Sheltering <br /> No updates since Progress Report III (summer workload) <br /> Community member Margaret Heath presented article entitled “A Gentle Kind of Cat Care: <br />Reducing anxiety, frustration, and URI in shelter cats” <br /> Community member Deanna Rowan sought any feedback on information presented at the last <br />meeting regarding cat colony rooms. Ms. Rowan emphasized her concern for giving space in <br />colony rooms to cats that have been at the shelter longer. <br /> Community member Bette Smith commented favorably on the communal cat housing at <br />Paws4Ever and suggested visitation of other facilities in evaluating use of cat colony rooms. <br /> Community members Wendy Long, Walt Turner, and Joan Danaher voiced their support for the <br />views expressed by other community members. <br /> Kris Bergstrand noted that cat colonies likely will not be a priority for the ASAB and shelter staff <br />in the next couple of years due to other pressing priorities, including a potential ordinance <br />amendment addressing feral cats. She also described her conversations with UC Davis Vet <br />School Shelter program vet Kate Hurley who advised that keeping more cats longer is not always <br />best for the cats, and that colony rooms, when used, should be limited to 4 cats. Lynn White <br />noted that the shelter currently has colony rooms and acknowledged concerns about spread of <br />disease. Suzanne Roy acknowledged that as long as animals are euthanized for space reasons, <br />there is room for improvement. Bob Marotto emphasized the overall importance of population <br />management in a shelter setting and its impacts on total animal placements. <br /> <br />New Business <br />(A) Animal Recovery and Sterilization Draft Report and Proposed Recommendations <br /> Lynn White presented task force report, which recommends (1) requiring microchipping of all <br />reclaimed animals at owner’s expense ($25) and (2) tiered impounding fees based on <br />reproductive status and number of impoundments.