Orange County NC Website
3 <br />Ms. Sprigg noted that the enormous amount of participation created synergy. This <br />endeavor requires more publicity, especially in the private sector. Streamlining the <br />planning document will result in easier readability. Jan Wells asked if the NC Division of <br />Aging Plan’s style is too simple. Ms. Sprigg responded that the key is to state what can <br />reasonably be accomplished in the five-year period. Mary Fraser asked about the size of <br />the Steering Committee, which previously included all subcommittee chairs. Ms. Sprigg <br />suggested that subcommittee chairs could report to the Steering Committee without <br />having membership. This Committee could be the evaluation group for the process. <br />Discussion followed about how the evaluation process could be designed. <br /> <br />The Chair asked the Advisory Board to consider its next step in this pre-plan process. <br />Ms. Sprigg noted that the Orange County Master Aging Plan was the first in North <br />Carolina and one of the first in the nation when it was adopted in 2001. She stated that <br />Carol Woods has a three-year plan with an annual work plan. The key is to solicit <br />community input early in the process, using the community engagement model to reach a <br />cross-section of the population. She referred to the large amount of data collected for the <br />previous plans that is available for use. Janice Tyler announced that several folks have <br />responded to the Senior Times notice to volunteer for this planning process. <br /> <br />The Chair asked the subcommittee who had reviewed other Plans (Allison, Castro, <br />Fraser, Wells) to report their findings. Ms. Fraser stated that many followed the NC <br />Division of Aging Plan format by identifying six issues. The State Plan focused on <br />categories of services: those to protect, improve, or expand. Another way to evaluate <br />service was to identify gaps in the system. Mary Fraser remarked that town hall meetings <br />are time consuming but the information gained would be very valuable. Ed Flowers <br />suggested targeting the Northern Orange, West Hillsborough, White Cross and Bingham <br />communities for input. The Cooperative Extension network and the Department on <br />Aging listserv are other avenues. A draft of the timetable was reviewed with the Plan <br />Update to be present to the County Commissioners in May, 2012. Alex Castro suggested <br />that the State Plan could be the template for the Orange County Update. Ms. Fraser <br />added that the Advisory Board could recommend the guiding principles for the Plan and <br />the Steering Committee could develop the content. <br /> <br />The plan review subcommittee agreed to review the Division of Aging Plan and make a <br />recommendation on its use as the template to the Advisory Board. The Board Chair and <br />Department Director will join in this effort. Ms. Harvey noted that the Healthy <br />Carolinians are currently conducting a community health assessment that may provide <br />information that will be useful to the planning process. <br /> <br />Jan Wells summarized the Senior Tar Heel Legislature 2011 priorities just adopted at the <br />meeting in Raleigh: <br />• Expand Project Care $1.5 million <br />• Increase HCCBG by $5 million (17,000 currently on waiting list for services) <br />• Increase funding for senior centers by $2 million <br />• Mandate random drug testing for long term care facilities staff <br />• Add four mobile units to the dental care program