Browse
Search
Minutes 01-30-2018 AOG
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Minutes 01-30-2018 AOG
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 2:51:25 PM
Creation date
2/21/2018 10:04:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/30/2018
Meeting Type
Assembly of Government
Document Type
Minutes
Agenda Item
2/20/18; 8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 01-30-2018 Assembly of Governments
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 01-30-2018 Assembly of Governments
Agenda Abstract - 01-30-2018 Assembly of Governments
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 01-30-2018 Assembly of Governments
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 <br /> <br />Items of Consideration <br />• Determine development goals <br />o Land use <br />o Location <br />o Density <br />• Determine affordable housing goals <br />o Mixed income <br />o Minimum percent <br />o Total number of affordable housing units sought <br />• Modification of the 2002 Resolution? <br />• Reconfigurations of the headwaters preserve areas? <br /> <br />Infrastructure <br />• Roads <br />o North, south, west, and east connections <br />• Norfolk Southern Railroad (East connection) <br />o Three existing crossings typically have to be closed in exchange for a new <br />crossing <br />o They will accept and consider a proposal for a new crossing without closings. <br />Decision is made based on various factors. Ultimately the decision is based on <br />what is in the company’s best interest <br />o Requesting party is responsible for all money involved with a proposal and, <br />ultimately, construction as well if approved <br />o Overhead / underground pedestrian and bicycle crossing also discussed. <br />Approval typically more easily accomplished but very expensive to construct <br />o Suggestion from railroad representative to consider obtaining one or more <br />parcels to provide alternative location for access without crossing railroad <br />• Water and Sewer <br />• Stormwater <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked staff to mark the property before any decisions are made, <br />so that the Board of County Commissioners and other boards can walk the property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobs left at 10:15 p.m. <br /> <br />How to Apportion use of 104 acres (chart) <br /> <br />Greene Tract – Environmental and Cultural Features <br /> <br />Greene Tract Conceptual Plan – Alternative 1 (high), headwaters existing (map) <br /> <br />Greene Tract Conceptual Plan – Alternative 2 (medium), headwaters existing (map) <br /> <br />Greene Tract Conceptual Plan – Alternative 3 (low), headwaters existing (map) <br /> <br />Headwaters Preserve Area <br />• Should the existing Headwaters Preserve area (60 acres) be reconfigured? (BOCC) <br />o A reconfiguration of the Headwaters Preserve area would allow for the protection <br />of the most preservation-worthy areas of the Greene Tract
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.