Orange County NC Website
13 <br /> <br />Council Member Stegman said it is good to have a group that is looking at the “why”. <br />She said there have been challenges identified with the proposed model, and she asked if other <br />food councils have been reviewed regarding structure and funding. <br />Ashley Heger said the partnership model was brought to the Council, but she does not <br />personally think it is the best fit. She said most councils in North Carolina are grassroots <br />organizations that have less than $20,000 budgets. She said some are directly connected to <br />Council of Governments, but most councils depend on a fiscal sponsor or a fiscal agent. She <br />said other councils focus on a particular area of the food sector, such as food access. <br />Council Member Buansi said the action plan indicates three open council seats, and <br />asked if these openings are being promoted. <br />Ashley Heger said part of the promotion strategy is to take the liaisons on the Council <br />and send them out to their communities and stakeholder groups to promote the Council. She <br />said social media and the website are also used, as well as public speaking opportunities. She <br />said they just received a micro grant to do listening sessions, which will be facilitated by the <br />Jackson Center in Chapel Hill, and will connect directly to work around mapping and tracking <br />racial equity in the food system. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said the list of relevant stakeholders does not include any <br />consumers. He said it is not hard to set up a 501(c)(3), and he urged the Food Council to look <br />at this option again. His said his concern is there are organizations in Orange County that were <br />left out of the Council’s matrix, and some of this reads like running in parallel to what already <br />exists, rather than incorporating. <br />Ashley Heger said the Council thoroughly reviewed the options of being within a fiscal <br />sponsor, creating a 501(c)(3), and the County’s proposal. She said the Council operates by <br />consensus, and chose to pursue the County’s proposal. <br />Alderman Slade said he hoped that all of the boards could see the viability of this Food <br />Council. <br /> <br />3. Manufactured Home Parks <br />Sherrill Hampton, Orange County Housing Director, and Craig Benedict reviewed the <br />following information and PowerPoint presentation: <br /> <br />BACKGROUND: <br />For many years the Orange County Board of County Commissioners had a keen interest in <br />addressing the vulnerability of residents living in mobile home parks and thus allocated funding <br />to address land banking for mobile home parks and/or to assist in the acquisition of property for <br />future residential development as an affordable housing alternative. Following this action by the <br />BOCC, local housing partners, County staff and other interested constituents began to discuss <br />and evaluate the opportunities and obstacles associated with re-developing an existing mobile <br />home park or developing new affordable housing to address the needs of mobile home park <br />residents at risk. Thus the Affordable Housing Land Banking/Mobile Home Park Work Group <br />was formed. <br /> <br />The presentation will provide an update on the work of the Affordable Housing Land <br />Banking/Mobile Home Park Work Group and the recommendations that were approved <br />by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners on November 20, 2017 in regard <br />to mobile home parks in the County, and proposed strategies for mitigating resident <br />displacement and relocation challenges due to re-development efforts. <br /> <br />Staff will provide any other information at the meeting, and the governing boards can <br />discuss issues and provide feedback to staff related to this item as necessary.