Browse
Search
Minutes 01-26-2018 Retreat
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Minutes 01-26-2018 Retreat
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 2:51:10 PM
Creation date
2/21/2018 10:02:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/26/2018
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Agenda Item
2/20/18; 8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - Retreat - 01-26-2018
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 01-26-2018 Retreat
Agenda 01-26-2018 Attachment 1 - Long Term Budget Forecast
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 01-26-2018 Retreat
Agenda 01-26-2018 Attachment 2 - Economic Development Site Related SWOT Analysis
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 01-26-2018 Retreat
Agenda 01-26-2018 Attachment 3 - BOCC Goals
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 01-26-2018 Retreat
Agenda 01-26-2018 Attachment 4 - 2018 Status Report on Goals and Policy Priorities
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 01-26-2018 Retreat
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />In reply to a question from Commissioner McKee, Mr. Hines said the limited availability of water <br />and sewer is most significant factor is making the County’s EDDs unattractive. <br /> <br />In reply to a question from Commissioner Price, Mr. Hall said if there was not a sufficient supply <br />of willing land owners within an EDD then the availability of willing land owners adjacent to an <br />EDD might open up new opportunities. <br /> <br />In reply to a question from Commissioner Price, Mr. Hines said that “legacy issues” were factors <br />in the ability of the Planning and Economic Development Departments to collaborate. We want <br />to ensure that both departments are on the same page, he said. He referred to a transportation <br />study conducted by Planning that had not engaged Economic Development. A collaboration gap <br />exists between Orange County and Hillsborough as well, said Mr. Hall. <br /> <br />Commissioner Marcoplos suggested that the Board revisit the Eno EDD during a future work <br />session. We might no longer be looking at that area in the same way as we did 30 years ago, he <br />said. Perhaps some modifications are in order. There are a lot of residents near there, sensitive <br />environmental areas, a blighted Scottish Inn property which I can’t imagine much better <br />replacing right now, and uncertainties about water and sewer. Maybe at that work session or <br />another time the Board can talk about boundary adjustment for the Buckhorn EDD. <br /> <br />In reply to a question from Commissioner Dorosin, Mr. Hines clarified that sewer service is an <br />even greater constraint than water supply. There is a limit on capacity now, and a further limit <br />imposed by the cost of providing that capacity, he said. If Mebane is going to spend $20M <br />upgrading its treatment capacity, for example, is Orange County going to pay for a proportion of <br />that cost in order to gain access to a proportion of that capacity? In addition, there are costs <br />associated with extending the water and sewer systems to the properties. Commissioner <br />Dorosin then asked f would make more sense to raise the profile of properties where there <br />already is water and sewer, beyond the EDDs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dorosin wondered how realistic it is to think in terms of “getting another <br />Morinaga.” Perhaps we’re not competitive for developments like that, and instead should be <br />more strategic about realigning our approach to another model. Mr. Hines said that it would be <br />smart to prepare for the next Morinaga – at least to know the costs of water and sewer <br />extensions to likely sites -- so that when it appears the County is positioned to act. You won’t <br />have time to act when the opportunity shows up. You need 12 months or less to extend the <br />utilities. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that during negotiations with Mebane about the Buckhorn EDD, the <br />City opposed future water and sewer extension below NC-10. If Timmons is recommending that <br />kind of expansion, then the implementation is going to be much more complicated than <br />Timmons appears to appreciate. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that Duke University might be interested in a research campus at <br />the Eno EDD. It’s so expensive to bring water and sewer to that area that we will need a <br />partner, and the only partners possible are Duke and Durham. We tend to be focused on <br />Carolina, but Duke is Orange County’s largest property owner. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that “big game hunting” needs to fit into a larger economic <br />development strategy. Part of that is, how much are we willing to invest in a framework for “big <br />game hunting.” We never have had that conversation. It would be good to have numbers to <br />inform us on what that would mean. Settlers Point was already zoned, but people still were very
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.