Orange County NC Website
17 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />figure out what we are going to do. I would like to say that we have a priority order for <br />decision making, where a tax increase is at the end. We might have to raise the tax, and it is <br />part of our responsibility to meet our fiscal obligations, but there are different ways that we <br />can get there. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rich said she was thinking along the same lines as Commissioner Jacobs. <br />Different residents of the county have different expectations of what our budget should be <br />and what we should be spending money on. Not everybody is going to be happy when we <br />start cutting or if we raise taxes. We should balance out as best as possible all that is before <br />us. Commissioner Jacobs added that the tax equity study’s presentation of the difference in <br />income across the different areas of the county is eye-opening. That’s a factor we never <br />really discuss, but it’s an underlying current in everything we do. <br /> <br />Commissioner McKee said that when he joined the Board seven years ago he was <br />adamantly opposed to any tax increase, because of the ten or eleven years of constant tax <br />increases. I have evolved in my thinking, he said. I don’t see how we are going to be able to <br />go forward long term without some tax increase. But I also don’t see how we can remain <br />healthy and affordable without cuts; and those cuts are going to be painful and they are <br />going to be adamantly opposed. We are going to have to be prepared for that. We’re not <br />going to see the storm that Commissioner Marcoplos referred to earlier, before it hits. <br /> <br />Commissioner Burroughs expressed appreciation for Commissioner Dorosin’s broadening of <br />the conversation. We definitely should look at efficiencies, cuts, and “selling the cow” by <br />making a short term adjustment in our reserves. We can talk at a high level about all these <br />things, but when we come back to this conversation after today we will be responding to the <br />Manager’s budget, she said. In fairness to the Manager, and as leaders, we need to give the <br />Manager some specific direction. In reply to a question from Commissioner Marcoplos. Ms. <br />Hammersley said it would be helpful to hear specific suggestions for cost efficiency <br />opportunities from the Commissioners, perhaps after the lunch break. <br /> <br />Commissioner Price said she agreed with the broader look suggested by Commissioner <br />Dorosin. We also have to be mindful of approaches that others can take to help the county <br />address the local economy, which impacts the County budget. She acknowledged the work <br />Commissioner Rich is doing on the living wage, for example. Economic development that <br />brings in jobs and additional development are factors affecting our budget as well, she said. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rich asked the staff to present after the lunch break on the actual dollar <br />amounts that would be added to the household budgets of owners of differently valued <br />homes under the two tax-increase scenarios. <br /> <br />12:00 Lunch Break <br /> <br />12:45 Continue Budget Exercise <br />We’ll focus on the set of items favored by a majority of the Board for the next <br />discussion: <br />• What Board values/goals is advanced by this set of potential priorities, and how? <br />• What concerns would staff or Board members have if this (majority) set of budget <br />priorities were adopted by the Board? <br />• How might the Board or staff address those concerns?