Orange County NC Website
15 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />• In reply to a question from Commissioner Price, Mr. Myren said there is no requirement for <br />the County to continue funding the Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) account. In <br />fact, last year the County did not make an OPEB contribution, he said. OPEB contributions <br />could increase as the County’s Full-Time Equivalent number increases. We know the <br />potential liability and are including it on our balance sheet. Commissioner McKee said he <br />feels the Board is obligated to fund OPEB. Ms. Hammersley said that everyone who is <br />eligible is receiving their benefits. The OPEB account is a savings tool we have to ensure, if <br />there are not enough “pay as you go” funds, then our retired employees would still be able <br />to receive their benefits. We are one of only two counties in the state that maintain an OPEB <br />account, she said. In states with greater economic challenges such as California and <br />Michigan it is needed more. I’m not opposed to the idea of the account, she said, but there <br />is a challenge to us when we’re trying to figure out whether to serve residents or fund this <br />savings account. Last year when we faced that challenge, we chose not to put additional <br />money into the account. Commissioner McKee said he supported last year’s decision, and <br />that there is no guarantee that we will not be faced with the same economic challenges as <br />the places where OPEB accounts are required. We have an ethical obligation to provide for <br />the former employees we have made promises to, he said. Ms. Hammersley said that the <br />County is indeed providing for them. <br />• In reply to a question from Commissioner Price, Mr. Myren said that “the break” anticipated <br />in new technology projects means the County will complete innovations that already have <br />been budgeted. This will enable the administration to continue with improvements that will <br />pose no burden on the budget. <br />• In reply to a question from Commissioner Dorosin, Mr. Myren said that a one-time increase <br />in the property tax rate of 4.56 cents would be combined with increased revenues from other <br />sources and/or reductions in expenditures. <br />• In reply to a question from Commissioner McKee, Mr. Myren said that Sportsplex operations <br />are indeed generating a surplus. The surplus is plowed back into operations to help the <br />organization absorb operational cost increases and stabilize its user fees. <br />• In reply to a question from Commissioner Dorosin, Mr. Myren said the County’s current <br />practice is to recapture through fees a little better than 80% of the costs of issuing building <br />and inspections permits. <br />• In reply to question from Commissioner Burroughs, Mr. Myren said the long term debt <br />capacity model he presented – in which as much as $200M of additional borrowing over six <br />years begins to be available in FY2024-25 if the County chooses to maintain $35M in debt <br />capacity – also assumes one of the two tax increase scenarios he presented earlier. <br />• Commissioner McKee said that the state of local school facilities, the increasing age of <br />County facilities, and population increases will require continued or increased capital <br />investment by the County over time. He asked the County staff to provide information on <br />what the expected demand will be for school and County facilities into the future, and how <br />that will impact borrowing and the tax rate. Ms. Hammersley said the chart on Capital <br />Budget Planning – Long Term Debt Capacity Model illustrates when (i.e., FY2024-25) the <br />County could afford to do another bond referendum if the Board so chooses. <br />• In reply to a question from Commissioner Price, Mr. Myren explained that while both of the <br />tax-increase scenarios are designed to pay for peak debt service ($39M) in FY2021-22, the <br />one-time tax increase generates more than is needed in the year it’s collected. The <br />additional revenue from the one-time increase would be placed in a capital reserve account <br />to pay for the debt service when it peaks. The incremental model collects revenue to cover <br />expenses “as you go” each year they are in effect. <br /> <br />Travis Myren’s presentation ended and the group continued its discussion: