Browse
Search
2018-041-E AMS - Legacy Research Associates Cultural and Archeological survey and site evaluation
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
2010's
>
2018
>
2018-041-E AMS - Legacy Research Associates Cultural and Archeological survey and site evaluation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2019 1:17:29 PM
Creation date
2/16/2018 9:17:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contract
Date
2/9/2018
Contract Starting Date
2/9/2018
Contract Document Type
Agreement - Consulting
Amount
$5,500.00
Document Relationships
R 2018-041 AMS - Legacy Research Associates Cultural and Archeological survey and site evaluation
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\Contract Routing Sheets\Routing Sheets\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16F7E188 -42F5- 4144- AF1B- 934E4ACOFE59 <br />2. General overview of prehistory and history of the study area; and <br />3. Expected archaeological potential for the project area, including expected site <br />types and settings, with the level of detail dependent on the size and scope of the <br />project. <br />e. Methodology <br />This section contains detailed discussions of the methods and techniques used during <br />the project to locate and evaluate sites. It is important that discussions be specific and <br />comprehensive. The methodology section should include: <br />a. Background Research Methods, including: <br />a. Information on how the background research was conducted; and <br />b. Locations where research was performed (e.g., local or regional libraries, <br />the archives at the OSA, online sources, etc.). <br />b. Field Methods, including: <br />a. A discussion of the survey techniques used, specifying any variations in <br />techniques due to varying field conditions (i.e., ground cover, alluviation, <br />erosion, development); <br />b. Details related to survey intensity, with specific attention to transect <br />spacing and subsurface testing interval(s); <br />c. Specifications of subsurface tests, including shape, size, depth, and <br />excavation technique(s); <br />d. Data recorded for each subsurface test; <br />e. Procedures followed for preserving contextual information of collected <br />materials; and <br />f. Mapping and photography procedures. <br />c. Lab Methods, including: <br />a. General methods used to process and catalog artifacts; <br />b. Explanation of how artifacts were analyzed, including information such <br />as the classification or typological schemes that were used to describe <br />different artifact types; and <br />c. Information on curation methods used and the location where the <br />curated collection will be housed. The standards for collections to be <br />curated by the OSA Research Center (OSARC) are detailed in Part 4 of <br />this document. <br />f. Results <br />This section describes sites located and materials recovered during the investigation. All <br />sites discovered should be described, whether or not they will be impacted by the <br />proposed undertaking. Each site should be documented using text, maps, and <br />photographs. Individual site descriptions should include site function (e.g., habitation, <br />quarry, butchering camp, grist mill, etc.), specific location, size, type and degree of <br />North Carolina Oce of State Archaeology — Archaeological Investigation Standard and Guidelines December 2017) Page 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.