Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-a- Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
>
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-a- Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2018 8:28:13 AM
Creation date
2/16/2018 8:33:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/20/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Board Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Minutes 02-20-2018
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 <br />1 Items of Consideration <br />2 • Determine development goals <br />3 o Land use <br />4 o Location <br />5 o Density <br />6 • Determine affordable housing goals <br />7 o Mixed income <br />8 o Minimum percent <br />9 o Total number of affordable housing units sought <br />10 • Modification of the 2002 Resolution? <br />11 • Reconfigurations of the headwaters preserve areas? <br />12 <br />13 Infrastructure <br />14 • Roads <br />15 o North, south, west, and east connections <br />16 • Norfolk Southern Railroad (East connection) <br />17 o Three existing crossings typically have to be closed in exchange for a new <br />18 crossing <br />19 o They will accept and consider a proposal for a new crossing without closings. <br />20 Decision is made based on various factors. Ultimately the decision is based on <br />21 what is in the company's best interest <br />22 o Requesting party is responsible for all money involved with a proposal and, <br />23 ultimately, construction as well if approved <br />24 o Overhead / underground pedestrian and bicycle crossing also discussed. <br />25 Approval typically more easily accomplished but very expensive to construct <br />26 o Suggestion from railroad representative to consider obtaining one or more <br />27 parcels to provide alternative location for access without crossing railroad <br />28 • Water and Sewer <br />29 • Stormwater <br />30 <br />31 Commissioner Jacobs asked staff to mark the property any decisions are made, so that <br />32 the Board of County Commissioners and other boards can walk the property. <br />33 <br />34 Commissioner Jacobs left at 10:15 p.m. <br />35 <br />36 How to Apportion use of 104 acres (chart) <br />37 <br />38 Greene Tract — Environmental and Cultural Features <br />39 <br />40 Greene Tract Conceptual Plan — Alternative 1 (high), headwaters existing (map) <br />41 <br />42 Greene Tract Conceptual Plan — Alternative 2 (medium), headwaters existing (map) <br />43 <br />44 Greene Tract Conceptual Plan — Alternative 3 (low), headwaters existing (map) <br />45 <br />46 Headwaters Preserve Area <br />47 Should the existing Headwaters Preserve area (60 acres) be reconfigured? (BOCC) <br />48 o A reconfiguration of the Headwaters Preserve area would allow for the protection <br />49 of the most preservation- worthy areas of the Greene Tract <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.