Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />4 H.11 <br />developable acres adjacent to rail within XX miles of the interstate, queries would be run to find <br />the best parcels available. Once the data is assembled running queries can be run quickly. <br />BUDGET: $15,000 to $25,000 <br />Study Recommendations <br />Consider advantages of developing "Ready to Go" product. Could form a public - private <br />partnership. <br />❑ Shovel /Pad Ready Sites <br />❑ SpecBuildings <br />Approximately 60 -70% of inquiries come in for Shovel / Pad Ready Sites and /or Existing <br />Buildings. Shovel ready and speculative building has some risk based on the financial <br />investment needed to develop sites; however, it is best way to reduce development timelines <br />and has proven to be a successful model in other locations throughout the state. <br />BUDGET: $50 to $100 per SF for Spec Buildings (including site work) <br />$50,000 to $100,000 per acre for Shovel /Pad Ready Sites <br />Study Recommendations <br />Consider gaining "control" of properties (i.e. option agreements) with high development <br />potential. These sites would be identified with the GIS Site Selection Study. <br />Approximately 60 -70% of inquiries come in for Shovel / Pad Ready Sites and /or Existing <br />Buildings. Shovel ready and speculative building has some risk based on the financial <br />investment needed to develop sites; however, it is best way to reduce development timelines <br />and has proven to be a successful model in other locations throughout the state. <br />BUDGET: $100 to $200 per acre for options <br />Study Recommendations <br />Reinitiate Discussions & explore developing a research park with UNC Chapel <br />Hill and taking advantage of the research and entrepreneurial culture of the Research Triangle <br />Park (RTP). <br />Developing a relationship with UNC and developing a common goal to create a research park <br />could be an easy step to help the County and University attract talent and industry to the region <br />similar to other Universities throughout the Country. <br />BUDGET: Staff Time <br />Comparable University Parks- graph <br />Other Considerations <br />❑ Re- evaluate and potentially reallocate funds for existing water and sewer projects that appear <br />to have minimal ROL <br />❑ Evaluate and enhance the expre s s " review process to make sure it is consttent with "fast - <br />track" permitting in the site selection market. <br />❑ Pursue grant opportunities for top sites (this will most likely require property cbntrol'). <br />❑ Gold Leaf <br />[:]Duke Energy Site Readiness Program <br />❑ Evaluate underdeveloped interchanges in the county (Exit 263 & 266 in particular). <br />Recommendation Per Area <br />Buckhorn EDD <br />❑ Work with Flea Market property owner on land price vs comps <br />❑ Complete due diligence items for available properties <br />❑ Work with the City of Mebane to increase water and sewer availability <br />Hillsborough EDD <br />