Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
19 <br /> <br /> <br />Proposed Signage Examples <br />Landmark Monument <br />60’ Height (max) <br />25’ width (max) <br /> <br />Portal Monument <br />36’ Height (max) <br />22’ Width (max) <br /> <br />Noted Conditions <br />• The developer has agreed to a condition to limit the percentage of lights left on after <br />normal hours of business <br />• The developer has agreed to reserve 1% of the required parking in District 2 (exclusive <br />of hotel parking) to support electric charging stations. <br />• The project is consistent with the County and Town of Hillsborough Joint Planning Land <br />Use Plan as reported by staff at the November 14, 2017 public hearing. <br /> <br />2020 Phase I – Build- map <br /> <br />2022 Buildout – map <br /> <br />In Summary <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if there is an estimate of the breakdown of district 2; <br />perhaps 30% retail and rest hotels or offices. <br />Commissioner Jacobs referred to the final map, and said it is hard to see what is being <br />proposed on such a small map. <br />Commissioner Jacobs referred to phase 1 and the 2020 service road, and said there is <br />a left turn lane in, and asked if there is a left turn lane out of the service road. <br />Ed Sirgany, Traffic and Technology Engineer for Summit Engineering, said there is a <br />proposed left turn lane for phase one. He said the drawing is not to scale, and it may be hard <br />to see. He said the lane goes in and out. He said the recommended improvement was a 200- <br />foot storage lane, to allow rights and lefts to split out. He said in the 2022 build out, this is <br />extended from 200 to 500 feet long. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if this would have a traffic light in phase one. <br />Ed Sigany said no. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if up to 900,000 square feet of space would not generate <br />enough traffic to warrant a light. <br />Ed Sirgany said the final revision removed the residential component, and took the <br />district one growth down to a more manageable traffic level. He said the traffic level is in line <br />with the Department of Transportation (DOT) targets. <br />Michael Harvey reminded the Board that it could find the same maps on pages 99 to <br />113 in this evening’s packet <br />Commissioner Jacobs referred to the west side of old 86, and asked if the property <br />extends to the service road only, and not to the south of it. <br />Ed Sirgany said they do not have any options on property south of the service road. <br />Jim Parker said that is correct, but there is sufficient right of way to add a lane. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he was thinking of moving it farther from I-40. He said DOT <br />breaks rules when it is desirable for DOT.