Orange County NC Website
181 <br />27, Recommend that you add an Existing Conditions sheet with the existing vegetation <br />and environmentally sensitive areas (including slope ranges, etc). <br />8. Please review the tab labels and references to contents so that they directly reflect <br />the name of the document(s) and or type of requirements_ For example FA - <br />Environmental Assessment is a specific application and requirement and should not <br />be confused with a Phase I Environmental study, We also recommend that at the <br />front of these minders you provide a sr,mmairy sheet that outlines the general site <br />plan, SUP specificfgeneral standards and findings of fact and where the item can <br />be found within the booklet and/or the site plan. This will make it Basler for you to <br />guide people as you conduct your presentations. <br />Erosion ControliStormwater Comments., <br />1. The project will need both an Erosion Control and Stormwater plan with a <br />corresponding application and fees. Please note as such on plans. <br />. Item 3_ in the site plan denotes that a 100 yr. flocd plain doesn't exist on the subject <br />parcel when the Orange County GIS indicates a 100 year. flood plain. Please <br />remove reference and revised to reflect FEMA Panel and Base Flood Elevation. <br />. The report results of wetland delineation denotes three ponds contiguous for the <br />western stream of the subject parcel however, Grange County GIS indicates five <br />pond features. The report also references the Orange County UDO incorrectly with <br />regards to Buffer's. The report demotes < 7.5 % slope buffer = 60' actual is 65" and <br />> 7.59% slope report denotes 85' actual is 80'. A Stream Call request (SWID) is <br />suggested for the parcel since current field conditions are the determining factor for <br />buffering surface waters. <br />4, ltern B. In the site plan needs to also reference that after approval of the Erosion <br />Control and Stormwater plan a preconstruction conference is required prior to any <br />land disturbance. <br />5. No net increase in peak flow leaving the site from the predeveloprnent conditions <br />for the 1 year, 24 Hour storm. <br />6. Nutrient limits for the Back Creek Protected watershed are Nitrogen 3.8 <br />poundslacrelyear, Phosphorous 1.43 poundslacrelyear. <br />7. Low Impact Development (LID) is suggested as a practical alternative for <br />management of the Stormwater for the site as we have seen success with Solar <br />Faun use of LID. <br />Department of Environment and Park and Recreation (DE APR)- <br />1. No edits/comments. See Attached memo. <br />Solid Waste Management: <br />1. No edits /comments. See Attached memo. <br />NGDOT: <br />1. Please coordinate directly with NCDOT District Engineer office at (33 6) 578 -8833 to <br />discuss change in Use and driveway permit needslrequirements. <br />