Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
218 <br />Draft <br />create a dire set of consequences for surrounding property owners and will not have a negative impact on the public, <br />safety or welfare. With respect to the value of contiguous property, within the agenda packet there is a report <br />regarding the impact of the facility on contiguous property values. That is enabling staff to make a recommendation <br />that the use will maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property. And finally, the location and character of the <br />use, if developed according to the plan submitted, will be in harmony with the area. Staff is basing that finding on the <br />application package, the staff abstract, the documented evidence and the various attachments, specifically <br />Attachment 1, Attachment 2, Attachment 5, and the Neighborhood Information Meeting. Staff recommends approval <br />of the Special Use Permit. <br />Patrick Mallett reminded the board of the process of voting and that the only condition that changed was Condition <br />Number 1, which involved changing the language from a conservation easement to a natural buffer area. <br />MOTION by Tony Blake to approve staff recommendations as detailed on Pages 154 -159 of the abstract packet. <br />Seconded by Hunter Spitzer. <br />VOTE: Unanimous <br />MOTION by Kim Piracci to find that, with respect to Section 5.3.2 (A) (2), the use will maintain or promote the public <br />health, safety and general welfare, if located where proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as <br />submitted. Seconded by David Blankfard. <br />VOTE: Unanimous <br />MOTION by Randy Marshall to find that with respect to Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b) The use will maintain or enhance the <br />value of contiguous property (unless the use is a public necessity, in which case the use need not maintain or <br />enhance the value of contiguous property). Seconded by Alexander Gregory. <br />VOTE: Unanimous <br />MOTION by Randy Marshall to find that with respect to Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c), the location and character of the use, <br />if developed according to the plan submitted, will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and the use <br />is in compliance with the plan for the physical development of the County as embodied in these regulations or in the <br />Comprehensive Plan, or portion thereof, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. Seconded by David <br />Blankfard. <br />VOTE: Unanimous <br />MOTION by Hunter Spitzer to approve the Special Use Permit with the imposition of the mutually agreed upon <br />conditions as listed on Pages 162 -163. Seconded by Tony Blake. <br />VOTE: Unanimous <br />